You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Al Qaeda threatens 'response' to Rushdie's knighthood
2007-07-11
Al Qaeda second-in-command Ayman al-Zawahiri said on Tuesday the group was preparing a “precise response” to Britain’s decision to knight author Salman Rushdie. “I say to Queen Elizabeth and Tony Blair that your message has reached us and we are in the process of preparing for you a precise response,” Zawahiri said in an audio recording posted on an Internet website often used by Islamic militants.

The queen had knighted Rushdie last month in her birthday honours list, prompting condemnation from a number of Muslim countries and organisations. The author is accused by some Muslims of blaspheming Islam in his novel “The Satanic Verses”, which triggered an international outcry when it was first published in 1988. The Indian-born Rushdie, 59, was forced to go into hiding for a decade after erstwhile Iranian supreme leader Aytatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a death sentence over the book in 1989. Khomeini’s successor, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said in January 2005 that he still believed the British novelist was an apostate whose killing would be authorised by Islam.

Following Rushdie’s knighting, Iran said the death sentence still stood. “The stance of the Islamic Republic of Iran on this issue has not changed from what was put forward by Imam Khomeini,” foreign ministry spokesman Muhammad Ali Hosseini said.

In the audio message billed “Malicious Britain and its Indian Slaves”, Zawahiri said Britain was hypocritical for giving Rushdie the knighthood under the banner of freedom of speech. He said the least Muslims could do was to boycott Britain to protest Rushdie’s knighthood. “Why don’t they honour the British historian David Irving? The queen did not honour him because she cannot rebel against the Jews, who are her masters,” he said.

Irving had spent 13 months in jail in Austria following a conviction there for Holocaust denial. Zawahiri also warned Britain’s new prime minister, Gordon Brown, to alter his state’s foreign policy. “The policy of your predecessor Tony Blair has brought tragedy and defeat upon you not only in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also in the centre of London. If you did not learn the lesson, we are prepared to repeat, God willing, until you have understood,” he said.

Zawahiri also praised an attack last month on UN peacekeepers in southern Lebanon in which six soldiers were killed. “This operation came as a response against the invading Crusader forces who were occupying a beloved part of the land of Islam,” he said.

Zawahiri also urged Hamas in the Palestininan territories to wage holy war against Israel and called on Muslims in Pakistan to resist their “corrupt” president, General Pervez Musharraf, by offering moral and financial support to militants in neighbouring Afghanistan. “An Islamic emirate in Afghanistan is the hope for real change in the region and hopefully the final blow to the Crusaders in South Asia,” he said.
Posted by:Fred

#12  Hey Z... suck on it!
Posted by: eltoroverde   2007-07-11 13:20  

#11  I think the Queen knew exactly what she was doing and I admire her for it. We need more books like the Satanic Verses, more Danish cartoons and more media outlets with the guts to publish them in the name of free speech, freedom of the press and in the name of sanity. Hollywood should be making movies about how ridiculous islam is instead of putting out tripe like Sicko or An Inconvenient Truth. Put this death cult under constant media scrutiny until all of its adherents understand that they should be ashamed of it.

Oh, and BTW, Dr. al-Z (yet another muzzie doctor turned terrorist), the Queen is nice and comfortable there in Buckingham Palace. Where are you holed up these days?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-07-11 12:14  

#10  Â“Why donÂ’t they honour the Purple Tracksuited British sports commentator David Icke? The queen did not honour him because she cannot rebel against the shape shifting reptilians, who are her masters,” he said.
Posted by: Admiral Allan Ackbar   2007-07-11 11:05  

#9  Israel should immediately award Rushdie it's "Wolf Prize".
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-11 11:03  

#8  Â“Why donÂ’t they honour the British historian David Irving? The queen did not honour him because she cannot rebel against the Jews, who are her masters,” he said.

Doc Knothead oughta hook up with Lyndon Larouche for some good Queen Talk. Looks like they share the same opinions on her.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-07-11 09:52  

#7  Reprisals work both ways.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-07-11 09:18  

#6  On a separate, but related point, this is more blowback from the disproportionate sentence passed on Irving.

Deborah Lipstadt, the plaintiff, made it quite clear that a custodial sentence was completely inappropriate. The fact that he was found guilty was enough to preserve the truth of the memories of the victims of the Holocaust. Freedom of speech should mean just that; our courts are there to arbitrate truth in cases of defamation and incitement, not to stifle discussion.

Nor should we be stifling discussion of Jihad within Islam, by imposing our rose-tinted views of the world on it. Let freedom reign and along with it, bring back the ability to discriminate between good and evil to a world where discrimination is the dirtiest of dirty words.
Posted by: Admiral Allan Ackbar   2007-07-11 09:09  

#5  "Precice" response? Could this actually mean something, or is it just yet another example of "Cultural Linguistic Differences", that makes Al's-Koran so difficult to translate.

Of course given the widened definition of "innocent" and "civilians", so often worked into the small print of the denunciations by the MMM-MSM puppets, widespread carnage in the dar-ul-harb could indeed be considered "Precise".

Alternatively, does this suggest a shift of tactics away from high profile stunts, to targeted assasinations and if so, what are the likely implications?

Regardless of all of this, it should be clear to anybody and everybody who still has an inkling of remaining doubt as to the motivations behind these attacks that they hate us for who we are, not what we do. Our very existence threatens their stupid retrograde ideology, almost as much as their continuing failures in every avenue of life does.

It is not so much a matter of telling people to choose sides, but forcing them to see reason, that most important of duties, criminally neglected by our useless post-modern academics.

The Rushdie Knighthood hurt them, clearly. Take note! So we give Knighthoods to Ibn Warraq, Patrick Sookhdeo, Trifkovic, Bat Ye'or. How about Rowan "Mr Bean" Atkinson, the only man with enough sense/stones to stand up to the religious incitement bill, prior to the Danish Cartoon Jihad? The Holy Order of Charles Martel.

Glasgow/London was nothing to do with Iraq, Tony/Gordon, 7/7 anniversary, it happened exactly and directly because it was publicly sanctioned by the Pakistani Minister Ejaz ul-Haq, two weeks prior.

Every single announcement from AQ has been followed up with an attack of some sort, as promised. So now, we wait, remain vigilant, remain on the ideologico-military offense, and pray that our security services get it right. Again.
Posted by: Admiral Allan Ackbar   2007-07-11 08:47  

#4  Worf: "Nice forehead"
Posted by: Frank G   2007-07-11 08:43  

#3  Mr Charisma strikes again. It can't be much fun having a face like a camel's ass. A MOAB would be the most humane option.
Posted by: Dark Lord of the Spheres   2007-07-11 08:33  

#2  The seething and knashing of teeth will begin in ernest when they discover that Rushdie was indeed "knighted" .....but to the secret and holy order of Godfrey de Saint-Omer of Templars.
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-07-11 02:32  

#1  Al Qaeda threatens 'response' to Rushdie's knighthood

may I suggest auto-castration Putas.
Posted by: RD   2007-07-11 01:52  

00:00