You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Court rejects Ohio domestic spying suit
2007-07-06
CINCINNATI - A federal appeals court ordered the dismissal Friday of a lawsuit challenging President Bush's domestic spying program, saying the plaintiffs had no standing to sue. The 2-1 ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel vacated a 2006 order by a federal judge in Detroit, who found that the post-Sept. 11 warrantless surveillance aimed at uncovering terrorist activity violated constitutional rights to privacy and free speech and the separation of powers.

U.S. Circuit Judge Julia Smith Gibbons, one of the two Republican appointees who ruled against the plaintiffs, said they failed to show they were subject to the surveillance.

The dissenting judge, Wait for it... Democratic appointee Ronald Lee Gilman, Damn Donks. believed the plaintiffs were within their rights to sue and that it was clear to him the program violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

Although the Bush administration said in January the program is now overseen by a special federal intelligence court, opponents said that without a court order, the president could resume the spying outside judicial authority at any time. The Justice Department has said the case is moot.

The American Civil Liberties Union led the lawsuit on behalf of other groups including lawyers, journalists and scholars it says have been handicapped in doing their jobs by the government monitoring.
You mean you were handicapped in your spying for the enemy...
Never said how they were handicapped, you'll notice ...
Others have filed court challenges to the program; this case proceeded the furthest. If the ACLU does not appeal, the case will be sent back to the U.S. district judge in Michigan for dismissal. The ACLU, the White House and the Justice Department did not immediately return calls seeking comment Friday.

The administration had said it sometimes needed to act without waiting for the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, established by a 1978 law. Bush authorized the program in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The ACLU filed suit in January 2006, a month after the program's existence became known publicly.

The government said the case involves state secrets whose disclosure would threaten national security. "The information ... is highly sensitive in nature, and goes to the heart of how the government's foreign intelligence gathering is conducted at a time when the nation is at war with an enemy that has already inflicted devastating damage on the United States by operating through a shadowy terrorist network," a Justice Department brief stated.
Posted by:DarthVader

#4  Only a LLL Moonbat can think of a valid reason why they would be on any side of a phone conversation with know or suspected terrorists.

You could be ordering pizza.
Posted by: ed   2007-07-06 20:51  

#3  Southwest Ohio is red country. Northern Ohio may be blue around Cleveland, but not down here in the center of the Midwest.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-06 20:10  

#2  "...believed the plaintiffs were within their rights to sue and that it was clear to him the program violated the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978."

BEFORE hearing any evidence, mind you.
Posted by: Thatch McGurque1195   2007-07-06 14:47  

#1  Only a LLL Moonbat can think of a valid reason why they would be on any side of a phone conversation with know or suspected terrorists.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-07-06 14:03  

00:00