You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Rushdie's knighting : 'Muslims should respond rationally'
2007-07-02
Speakers at an academic discussion arranged by Iqbal International Institute for Research, Education and Dialogue (IRED) on the issue of the knighthood of Salman Rushdie on Sunday called upon the Muslim youth to conduct academic research to give a logical response to such issues.

The discussion titled ‘What is Satanic in Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses?’ was held at IRED secretariat.

IRED Executive Director Dr Riffat Hassan said Salman Rushdie’s book ‘Satanic Verses’ was a deliberate attempt to provoke Muslims. “Muslim scholars must give a rational response to the blasphemous book by logical argumentation to expose its malicious contents,” said Dr Riffat.

She said the main objective of the discussion was to educate the Muslim youth about the important aspects of the book such as its structure, themes, language and the reason of its universal condemnation by Muslims.

“Despite giving an emotionally intense reaction, Muslims have made little effort to refute the distortion of facts by the author.” She added. Muslim youth should be equipped with the necessary knowledge to give a correct interpretation of Islam and to dispel the false attributions made to the faith and its Prophet (PBUH) by Islam-bashers like Rushdie, Dr Riffat added.

She said Muslim masses had expressed their anger through worldwide protests against the knighting of Rushdie.

She characterised the blasphemous book as ‘hate literature’ and said it was the duty of Muslim scholars to present the true picture of Islam.

Prof Naveed Shahzad, dean of Faculty of Liberal Arts at Beaconhouse National University, said Muslims should not be surprised at the act, because history was replete with attempts to malign and misrepresent Islam.
Quoting various passages from the book, she critically evaluated the text and disproved the writerÂ’s claim that the novelÂ’s contents and characters were fictional. She said Rushdie had been a student of history at Cambridge University and was well aware of the history of Islam.

He intentionally distorted facts pretending that whatever was said in the book was a fantasy and that his characters, especially Mahound, had nothing to do with Islam or its Prophet (PBUH), she said. Columnist Eraj Zakaria questioned the award of knighthood by the British Crown in spite of RushdieÂ’s sharp criticism of Britain and his use of un-parliamentary language against the Queen. Dr Riffat said that even the majority of the British people were opposed to the decision of knighting Rushdie.

Prof Naveed Shahzad, dean of Faculty of Liberal Arts at Beaconhouse National University, said Muslims should not be surprised at the act, because history was replete with attempts to malign and misrepresent Islam.
Posted by:Fred

#13  Nyah-nyah, nyah-nyah, IIIIIII'm a knight!
So bow down before me, Islamic Rage Boys!!
Posted by: Sir Salman Rushdie   2007-07-02 15:01  

#12  'Muslims should respond rationally'
Some likelihood!

It far better to continue the search for the Holy Grail from where Sir Galahad left off.
Posted by: Duh!   2007-07-02 14:54  

#11  'Muslims should respond rationally'

Yeah, good luck with that.
Posted by: mojo   2007-07-02 11:51  

#10  lots of good pts. A strong attempt needs to be made toward muslim youth. Especially the females - like we a trying in iraq. Great target audience for the debunk message I advocated last night.

Personal anectdote; Some of the iraqi interpreters I knew ("terp" for short) were real even keel about islam - most of these guys liked to play soccer in their off time and all of them wanted to come state side. We also had one Jordanian female who we all liked. A lot of the American muslims I trained w/in Cali were of different sects and often argued about the koran but they were all fairly agnostic or deistic in their beliefs - though so am I pretty much so we hit it off real well. I thought it was funny listening to them jabber about the koran when all of them didn't follow 80% of it. Most of them just wanted to chase girls and drive nice cars. Pretty much like any normal 20-something kid in the U.S. I did not worry about them in any 5th column or subterfuge sense - these guys actually had to protect their real i.d.'s for obvious reasons. They hated the Hussein regime, had family histories to prove it and knew the great deal they had in the U.S. - I've no problem w/these types of folks because they keep the religion to themselves. It's the idiots in Dearborn wearing burkas, disparaging inner city blacks & talking about how great the culture of the old country was who are trying to make "Dearbornistan" that need to leave most rik-tik.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2007-07-02 11:13  

#9  Most muslims havent even read the book.They rely on their so called Scholars/Imans to pass judgement.Brainwashing is easy in Islamic countries.

We need to target the messengers of hatred ie the Scholars and the so called Holy men!!!!!

That is what this War on Terror is all about is to take religion out of state policy.Countries like Iran,Saudi and Pakistan the religious authorities have too much say/Power which they fearlosing!!!
Posted by: Paul   2007-07-02 10:44  

#8  Muslim scholars must give a rational response

Muslim scholars believe they are giving a rational response. That's the problem. allan says kill, and they kill. allan says rage and seethe, and they rage and seethe. allan says froggy, and they jump.
Posted by: anymouse   2007-07-02 06:26  

#7  > because history was replete with attempts to malign and misrepresent Islam.

Lots of people have read the koran terrorism manual.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2007-07-02 04:28  

#6  and then post it on YouTube.

now that's just plain mean.
Posted by: 8872   2007-07-02 03:06  

#5  "Dr Riffat said that even the majority of the British people were opposed to the decision of knighting Rushdie."

Err, where's your source Riffy? Me, I normally couldn't give a monkeys who gets a knighthood (they're usually people who have helped Bliar and co. along), but on this occasion, and for the one reason that it's totally pissed off the RoP (TM), I wholeheartedly endorse his investiture and wish Her Majesty would do it again - and then post it on YouTube.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2007-07-02 02:14  

#4  Respond with humility unless you want to burn an Armani suit in effagy.
Posted by: newc   2007-07-02 01:30  

#3  For some reason, the Stanley Cup comes to mind.

4:30 comes early. Later.
Posted by: Mike N.    2007-07-02 01:02  

#2  "Rational Muslims". Goes well beyond "Military Intelligence", eh?

O/T: Mike N., you mentioned elsewhere how yesterday's responses were limited to cell phone texting. I just wanted to say that your own replies seemed both timely and well-thought out.

As to squaliformes settimana, that is another matter entirely.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-02 00:54  

#1  Muslims should respond rationally

When was the last time that happened? If they did, we wouldn't be in this mess.
Posted by: Mike N.    2007-07-02 00:03  

00:00