You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Senior Iranian cleric whacked
2007-06-26
Ardeshir Arian, Pajamas Media

Rasa News Agency, which belongs to the religious school of Qum -the mullahÂ’s Vatican in Iran- reports that a group of unidentified gunmen shot and killed Hesham Saymary of the Alavi section in Ahavz, southern Iran, an area where many Iranian Arabs live. The incident took place last Sunday night at about 10:00 PM local time.

According to the information, gunmen were outside SaymaryÂ’s home waiting for him to arrive, and called him as he was about to enter. As soon as he turned to answer they shot him three times, causing his instant death.

Although the dead cleric is a member of the Iranian Arab population of Ahvaz, the regime blames both a small Arab-speaking separatist group from Ahvaz and the Wahabbis -the religious sect that Ben Laden belongs to- for the killing.

A report in Baztab, a website owned by a close friend and ally of ex-president Rafsanjani, Mohsen Rezaei, called the group “an Arab separatist movement”. The Islamic regime is well aware of the Iranians’ feelings against separatism and therefore it was putting the blame on the “bad guys” no matter what the reality may be.

Suprisingly, while doing some research for this story I could not find any report in English. Is this another attempt by the regime to keep this assassination low key and prevent the unrest from spreading? Mullah Hesham is the third senior figure in the Iranian regime killied in the past two months by unknown revolutionaries, and authorities are again trying to play it down.

Interestingly, the other two assassinations took place too close to Tehran for the regime to blame the separatists. So who did it? Are there more groups taking action? Definitely something to think about.
Posted by:Mike

#22  I think the author is hinting that the Iranian government routinely kills its own citizens for its own reasons and then blames a believable opposition group. Although the actual case may be different, the writer's implication is clear to me. You would think that a theocracy wouldn't need firearms and brassknuckles to get the job done. Maybe Ussia is a theocracy also.
Posted by: Super Hose   2007-06-26 23:26  

#21  "Sometimes a Muzzy assassination is a Muzzy assassination." - S. Freud, Vienna, 1932
Posted by: Sigmund Freud   2007-06-26 20:42  

#20  Well done HBoT Division. Regards HRSEG Division
Posted by: Halliburton - Remote Seismic Event Generation Division   2007-06-26 20:07  

#19  Is it too late to take credit for this operation?
Posted by: Halliburton - Band of Thugs Division   2007-06-26 20:03  

#18  I think Mookie al Sadr did it. He's got a history of whacking senior Shia clerics to free up ladder rungs for himself.

He's just antsy about qualifying for the executive dental benefits plan.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-06-26 19:48  

#17  This site says Saymary openly opposed the Wahabists. The killing may have more to do with the Saudis than the Iranians.
Posted by: lotp   2007-06-26 19:28  

#16  "Hashashin" means: hashish eaters. Assassin cultists - young unconnected males - were indoctrinated in lush gardens, in order to give them a feel of Muslim heaven, which would be a reward for commission of murder, mutilation and torture on earth.
Posted by: Pheang Jones9468   2007-06-26 19:08  

#15  Colonel Flagg: "I am the wind"
Posted by: Frank G   2007-06-26 17:52  

#14  The term 'Assassin' is thought to be derived from its connections to the Hashshashin, a militant religious sect of Ismaili Muslims, thought to be active in the Middle East in the 8th to 14th centuries. This mystic secret society killed members of the Abbasid elite for political or religious reasons.

It was said that they were drugged during their murders, often with materials such as hashish and opium. The name assassin is derived from either hasishin for the supposed influence of the drugs, and disregard for their own lives in the process, or hassansin for their leader, Hassan-i-Sabah.

Today, it is known that hashishinnya was an offensive term used to depict this cult by its Muslim and Mongolian detractors; the extreme zeal and cold preparation to murder makes it unlikely they ever used drugs. As far as is known they only used daggers, rarely survived their attacks, even when successful (unlike in many tales, where they are silent, invisible killers)[citation needed] and it seems that they rarely acted against westerners during the Crusades, partly because the crusading orders were not as affected by losing individual leaders as were the autocratic local regimes of the time.[3]

But I suspect you knew, NS!
Posted by: Bobby   2007-06-26 17:40  

#13  Now what is the etymology of assassin?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-06-26 17:28  

#12  I think Mookie al Sadr did it. He's got a history of whacking senior Shia clerics to free up ladder rungs for himself.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-06-26 17:24  

#11  It doesn't get a lot of press in the West, but assasinations have long been a feature of the Iranian opposition.
Posted by: phil_b   2007-06-26 17:24  

#10  This is very interesting. It suggests that the Iranian agenda has it's opposition. Even though said opposition is on the decline.
I'm sure if they look closer, they will find evidence that Joooos where in the neighborhood.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-06-26 17:21  

#9  #7 --The regime is blaming Arab seperatists (who are real unpopular in Iran) --
----------------------------
but they will become less unpopular if they are known to be successful at Cleric Whacking
Posted by: mhw   2007-06-26 16:53  

#8  Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

"No comment and don't quote me. I was not here and this conversation did not happen. I do not exist."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-06-26 16:50  

#7  --The regime is blaming Arab seperatists (who are real unpopular in Iran) --

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

If it's good for the Philippines......and Chechnya.......and China...........
Posted by: anonymous2u   2007-06-26 16:38  

#6  But we ARE.
Posted by: NSA, Mossad, Shin Bet, MI5   2007-06-26 15:59  

#5  Who knew? Holy men ventilate just as easily as us plebes...
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-06-26 15:55  

#4  We are not not killing mullahs...
Posted by: CIA   2007-06-26 15:41  

#3  summary for #1

Somebody offed a big Mullah in Iran. Said Mullah was a member of the Arab speaking minority (in the southwest) but was pro-regime anyway. The regime is blaming Arab seperatists (who are real unpopular in Iran) but the author of the article hints strongly thats not who did it, theres a more widespread campaign of unrest.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2007-06-26 15:33  

#2  the regime blames both a small Arab-speaking separatist group from Ahvaz and the Wahabbis -the religious sect that Ben Laden belongs to- for the killing.

Kewl! Best news in ages. Let's get the suicide artists clusterf*cking the terrorist indoctrinators. Talk about a win-win!
Posted by: Zenster   2007-06-26 15:11  

#1  Saywhat?
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-06-26 15:04  

00:00