Submit your comments on this article |
Arabia |
House votes to ban aid to Saudi Arabia |
2007-06-23 |
![]() The prohibition, reflecting persistent tensions with the kingdom after the September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001, was attached to a foreign aid funding bill for next year that has not yet been debated by the Senate. It also faces a veto threat from the White House because of an unrelated provision. A spokesman for the Saudi embassy in Washington declined to comment on the legislation. In the past three years, Congress has passed bills to stop the relatively small amount of U.S. aid to Saudi Arabia, only to see the Bush administration circumvent the prohibitions. Now, lawmakers are trying to close loopholes so that no more U.S. aid can be sent to the world's leading petroleum exporter. "By cutting off aid and closing the loophole we send a clear message to the Saudi Arabian government that they must be a true ally in advancing peace in the Middle East," said Rep. Anthony Weiner, a New York Democrat. According to supporters of the legislation, the United States provided $2.5 million to Riyadh in 2005 and 2006. The money has been used to train Saudis in counter-terrorism. |
Posted by: |
#9 Symbolism. Now turning down Saudi money, on the other hand... |
Posted by: Pappy 2007-06-23 20:52 |
#8 Oops, overlapped with Procopius2K |
Posted by: lotp 2007-06-23 09:07 |
#7 IIRC since we aren't in a formal alliance like NATO with the Saudis, the only way to do things like counterterrorism with them is through an 'aid' package. I imagine we want to train them in counterterrorism because it's a way to exchange useful info. But I could well be wrong on either or both points. |
Posted by: lotp 2007-06-23 09:06 |
#6 I suspect this is "military aid" which is actually a bookkeeping mechanism to payback the American companies or government bureaucracies for authorized material or access. I'm sure the Sauds can buy anything they want in an open market, but some things are not open and require such mechanisms to operate. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-06-23 09:04 |
#5 What TW said. |
Posted by: gromgoru 2007-06-23 07:30 |
#4 I do not understand why we're giving financial aid to the richest of the OPEC nations. Surely they must be mortified to receive charity... unless they think of it as jizya, the dhimmi poll tax, in which case they should be embarrassed that's all they could get out of us. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2007-06-23 06:11 |
#3 It is good to see, but 2.5 million is chickenfeed to the Saudis. The Saudis can buy govt, ex govt officials and congressmen any time. |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2007-06-23 04:08 |
#2 If this actually passes you can tie me to a hog and throw me in the mud. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-06-23 03:01 |
#1 That's progress. Small, but still a slap to the chops. |
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970 2007-06-23 00:49 |