You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
U.S. dropping Tickets to Paradise bombs on Iraq at twice last year's rate
2007-06-06
BAGHDAD: Four years into the war that opened with "shock and awe," U.S. warplanes have again stepped up attacks in Iraq, dropping bombs at more than twice the rate of a year ago.

The airpower escalation parallels a nearly four-month-old security crackdown that is bringing 30,000 additional U.S. troops into Baghdad and its surroundings — an urban campaign aimed at restoring order to an area riven with sectarian violence.

It also reflects increased availability of planes from U.S. aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf. And it appears to be accompanied by a rise in Iraqi civilian casualties.

In the first 4 1/2 months of 2007, American aircraft dropped 237 bombs and missiles in support of ground forces in Iraq, already surpassing the 229 expended in all of 2006, according to U.S. Air Force figures obtained by The Associated Press.

"Air operations over Iraq have ratcheted up significantly, in the number of sorties, the number of hours (in the air)," said Col. Joe Guastella, Air Force operations chief for the region. "It has a lot to do with increased pressure on the enemy by MNC-I" — the Multinational Corps-Iraq — "combined with more carriers."

The Air Force report did not break down the specific locations in Iraq where bombings have been stepped up. But U.S.-led forces also are locked in new and dangerous fronts against insurgents outside Baghdad in such places as Diyala, a province northeast of the capital.

A second U.S. Navy aircraft carrier on station since February in the Persian Gulf has added some 80 warplanes to the U.S. air arsenal in the region.

At the same time, the number of civilian Iraqi casualties from U.S. airstrikes appears to have risen sharply, according to Iraq Body Count, a London-based, anti-war research group that maintains a database compiling news media reports on Iraqi war deaths. Zarqawi was a "civilian".

The rate of such reported civilian deaths appeared to climb steadily through 2006, the group reports, averaging just a few a month in early 2006, hitting some 40 a month by year's end, and averaging more than 50 a month so far this year.

Those are maximum tolls based on news reports, and they count those killed by Army helicopter fire as well as by warplanes, Iraq Body Count's John Sloboda said. The count is regarded as conservative, since it doesn't include deaths missed by the international media.

The U.S. military itself says it doesn't track civilian casualties.

"The reality of civilian deaths is a year-on-year increase," said Sloboda, a psychology professor at Britain's Keele University. "This particular part of it — airstrikes — have rocketed up more than any other."

Air Force figures show that, after the thousands of bombs and missiles used in the 2003 "shock and awe" invasion, U.S. airpower settled down to a slow bombing pace: 285 munitions dropped in 2004, 404 in 2005 and 229 in 2006, totals that don't include warplanes' often-devastating 20mm and 30mm cannon or rocket fire, or Marine Corps aircraft.

The number of Air Force and Navy "close air support" missions, which usually involve a flyover show of force or surveillance work, rather than bombing, also has grown by some 30 to 40 percent this spring, said Army Lt. Col. Bryan Cox, a ground-forces liaison at the regional air headquarters.

Examples of attacks, as reported in the Air Force's daily summary:

_Last Friday, an Air Force F-16 fighter dropped a guided 500-pound bomb near the northern city of Tal Afar that destroyed a vehicle laden with explosives to be used as a bomb.

_The day before, an F-16 dropped a similar bomb on "an inaccessible building being used by insurgents" near Samarra, north of Baghdad, with "good effects."

_Last Wednesday, another F-16 dropped bombs on "an illegal bridge and an insurgent vehicle in Baghdad."

Police and other Iraqi sources sometimes report civilian casualties in such airstrikes that are not reflected in the official U.S. accounts.

Air Force Col. Gary Crowder, deputy director of the regional air operations center, said such casualties "pale in comparison" with civilian casualties from ground combat.

"In Iraq, we minimize our deployment of air-delivered weapons in populated areas," he said.

Crowder, Guastella and Cox were interviewed outside Iraq at the regional U.S. air headquarters. Journalists are allowed to visit that low-profile base on condition they don't disclose its location, a politically sensitive matter to the host country.

Air attacks in Iraq are still relatively low compared with the numbers of weapons dropped in Afghanistan — 929 this year as of May 15.

Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#12  That's very good news, McZoid. Thank you.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-06-06 16:47  

#11  Tell 'em to drop all they want. We'll make more...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-06-06 16:40  

#10  Actually, field troops were taking it directly to the enemy before the kidnappings. IED caused deaths are down, while active combat casualties were higher in May. Trust me: troops are fighting exactly the kind of war that they want to fight. Morale is high, and locals are providing more intel.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-06-06 16:38  

#9  This article is typical MSM disinformation.

The number of PGM delivered is up but the reason is simply that the number of targets ID'd is up as a result of increasing cooperation from the Sunni Iraqis who are dropping the dime on the terrs with increasing frequency. This is an indicator of success. This is all covered in an excellent Strategy Page article that also notes that while PGM deliveries are up over 100% civilian casualties resulting therefrom are up only 25%, a fact the MSM also fails to note. Instead they use a BS figure from fellow terr sympathisers people in London.

And if we're using Navy aircraft to deliver ordnance, I hope it's in Basra because that's an awfully expensive way to deliver a bomb.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-06-06 11:33  

#8  The surge has turned into a nationwide offensive against any and every remaining enemy occupied area.

When the dumbasses kidnapped the soldiers, the search quickly turned into an aggressive offensive that is clearing out a great number of bad guyz of all descriptions. It has turned out to be one of the worst mistakes they ever made.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-06-06 11:21  

#7  Hey, the media makes the rules, don't ya see. You are not allowed to drop more than a certain amount of bombs in the war without Pinch Sulzberger's approval. Why, its just not fair. Sort of like in baseball. Its not fair that the Yankees have such a high payroll but are the furthest out of 1st place of any team. If it was up to the media, all the other teams - Boston, Baltimore,et.al. - would only be allowed to hit one homerun a game and only if that homerun didn't win any away games. That way the feelings of the home fans would not be hurt and the Yankees could gain a little more respect.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-06-06 11:13  

#6  More is better. Even more will be even better, as the flow of useful information continues to increase. But surely things that blow up houses and bad guys don't come only from infernal flying machines, which suggests to me in my ignorance of such things that good guy-caused explosions increased at a great deal more than double the previous rate. Go, exploders, go!
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-06-06 10:28  

#5  I hope we can make the exact same claim next year.
Posted by: Kojo Chealing2691   2007-06-06 10:19  

#4  The rate of such reported civilian deaths appeared to climb steadily through 2006, the group reports, averaging just a few a month in early 2006, hitting some 40 a month by year's end, and averaging more than 50 a month so far this year.

Estimates of civilian deaths are always suspect. However, that said, we are losing around 100 soldiers per month. If bombing shortens the war, saves soldiers and kills civilian terrorists, please do more bombing.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-06-06 10:17  

#3  So the bomb rate has tripled, to 650 bombs per YEAR! A half dozen B-52s could deliver that in one run.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-06-06 10:13  

#2  More like we're trying to find them and take them out.

When will the rest of the surge troops get in there?
Posted by: danking_70   2007-06-06 10:04  

#1  Good. That means we are finding them more and taking them out more.

Faster please.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-06-06 09:51  

00:00