You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
House Approves Speedy Jefferson Probe
2007-06-06
WASHINGTON (AP) - The House approved a speedy internal investigation of indicted Rep. William J. Jefferson with a pair of votes Tuesday that could nudge him from Congress before his bribery trial. Recalling the message of the November elections that stripped Republicans of control of Congress, House members endorsed two resolutions that require the ethics committee to investigate allegations of wrongdoing more quickly than in past years.

Jefferson, meanwhile, resigned his seat on the Small Business Committee in response to his indictment on federal charges of taking more than $500,000 in bribes. Democrats already had moved to take that seat away from him. Jefferson admitted no wrongdoing. The nine-term congressman had few allies among the leaders of his own party.
Sorta like what happens when a Chicago alderman gets indicted by the Feds. All of a sudden no one knows him and no one will stand near him on the council floor. Might be contagious, after all.
The charges against Jefferson, ``if proven true, should lead to the expulsion of the member in question,'' said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who succeeded in ousting Jefferson from the Ways and Means Committee, issued a similar statement Monday.

Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio offered a resolution directing the ethics committee to report on whether the charges in the indictment merit Jefferson's expulsion. The House passed it, 373-26. Thirteen members voted present.
Wonder if Allan Mollohan gets the same treatment as Jefferson? His 'alleged' crimes are just as serious, if not more so.
Expelling a House member before a conviction would be unprecedented, according to the Congressional Research Service. But it was not clear that would happen in Jefferson's case, because the ethics committee could refuse to rule on whether the nine-term congressman should be thrown out of the House, according to a Democratic leadership aide. Still, Republicans and a few Democrats said publicly and privately that Jefferson should step down.
He'll resign before the end of the month.
I dunno. He's pretty shameless.
Hoyer, meanwhile, proposed a second resolution that directs the ethics committee to respond to the indictment of any House member by empaneling an investigative committee within 30 days. Hoyer's resolution passed 387-10, with 15 members voting present.
Posted by:Steve White

#11  As long as you've got convictions about it, CS #9 &10. ;-p
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-06-06 19:24  

#10  As as I am concerned the nutty people in his district just reelected him knowing full well that he was a crook, so leave him in place.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-06-06 19:13  

#9  As as I am concerned the nutty people in his district just reelected him knowing full well that he was a crook, so leave him in place.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-06-06 19:13  

#8  Spineless Reps that voted 'present.' i have more respect for those that voted against that these jellyfish. any bets as to the party breakdown of these scumsuckers?
Posted by: USN. Ret.   2007-06-06 15:01  

#7  Speedy, as in, not-too-soon-after-the-last-election-but-a-long-way-away-from-the-next-one.

I question the timing. Again.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-06-06 10:31  

#6  Speedy, as in 'we gotta get this guy outta here, before the media slips up and calls him a Democrat'.
Posted by: Pappy   2007-06-06 09:44  

#5  It was certainly some time ago, gorb. And at the time the House refused to refer the case to the ethics committee.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-06-06 09:43  

#4  Democrats never resign. Deny, deny, deny and hope you get that one moonbat juror you need for the hung jury...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-06-06 09:38  

#3  I also love how the article goes out of its way not to explicitly mention Jefferson's a Democrat...
Posted by: Raj   2007-06-06 08:39  

#2  I think he should stay in Congress. We have a representative government, and the criminals have a right to representation too. His district has the highest murder rate in the country (by a factor of 50-100%!), so who better than he should be that representative?
Seriously, shouldn't he be convicted before being kicked out? He should resign, but I am not so sure he should be kicked out. Sets kind of a bad precenent.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-06-06 07:24  

#1  Speedy?

Odd choice of words. Do they mean as speedy as it took them to approve the probe? The guy might die of old age before this is all done.

One bit of data that seems to be missing from this article for some reason is which year the dirtbag got caught with the money in his freezer. Was it 2005?
Posted by: gorb   2007-06-06 03:21  

00:00