You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
'Officers too concerned with soldiers' lives in war'
2007-06-06
Israeli commanders' over-concern for their soldiers' lives during the Second Lebanon War hurt the war effort, according to Prof. Asa Kasher, the architect of the IDF Code of Ethics. "Missions were not completed because commanders did not want to jeopardize their soldiers' lives," he said at a conference on military ethics Tuesday in Jerusalem. "Concern about casualties is important," Kasher said. "Soldiers are not robots, they are human beings. But the commander must not underestimate the importance of his mission vis a vis the importance of his soldiers' lives. The Hizbullah were shooting hundreds of rockets at population centers in the North, thus endangering Israeli citizens' lives. So risking soldiers' lives to stop those rockets was perfectly justified."

Military officers from Denmark, Austria, Finland, the UK, Sweden, Romania, the Czech Republic, the US and other countries are attending the three-day International Association for Military Pedagogy conference at Mishkenot Sha'ananim sponsored by the Jerusalem Center for Ethics. Of all the armies in the world with a code of ethics, Kasher said, only the IDF taught the sanctity of life as a value that should be internalized by the soldier. He attributed that to Jewish tradition, which puts pikuah nefesh (the saving of life) at the center of its moral system.
"Commanders on the battle field did not want to risk their soldiers' lives to carry out an order that might be changed in the next hour," he said.
"I'm not saying other cultures do not value life," he said. "I just think that Jews are more willing to openly discuss it, to put it on the table."

The phenomenon of commanders being overly protective of their soldiers' lives was not a result of a general "softening" of the Israeli soldier, Kasher told The Jerusalem Post after his lecture. Rather it was a symptom of the atmosphere during the Second Lebanon War in which different and often contradictory orders were given by the high command within short periods of time. "Commanders on the battle field did not want to risk their soldiers' lives to carry out an order that might be changed in the next hour," he said.
Posted by:Fred

#6  Israeli Officers too concerned with soldiers' lives in war'

Perhaps THe Brass, full bird colonels and above need a NEW Military Hippocratic Oath! [Do No Harm...]

/maybe ours [USA] should too. Since they seem incapable of letting combat troops do combat like they were trained, instead they compulsively keep tinkering and inventing deadlier and deadlier non-combat ROEs for our men and women.

/btw, ima just talkin... ;-)
Posted by: RD   2007-06-06 23:43  

#5  Sounds like the USARV.
Posted by: Sherebmanper Scourge of the Platypi1150   2007-06-06 12:00  

#4  The bastards!!!
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-06-06 11:49  

#3  at first, I was a bit put off, but by the time I got to the end, I agreed with the commanders on the ground. I fault the upper level command that interfaced with the politicians, who should have demanded clear objectives and unwavering support when missions are launched.
Posted by: ptah   2007-06-06 11:23  

#2  I wouldn't commit my boys to an attack that might be called off and we have to give the target back to the enemy in an hour either.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-06-06 10:00  

#1  "Commanders on the battle field did not want to risk their soldiers' lives to carry out an order that might be changed in the next hour"

Sounds pretty intelligent to me. But then, I was never a politician.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-06-06 05:52  

00:00