You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Al Gore thinks he's a Vulcan?
2007-05-29
Prof. Ann Althouse

What's with Al Gore and his book called "Assault on Reason"? David Brooks thinks he has "a bizarre view of human nature." (TimesSelect link.)

Gore seems to have come up with a theory that the upper, logical mind sits on top of, and should master, the primitive and more emotional mind below. He thinks this can be done through a technical process that minimizes information flow to the lower brain and maximizes information flow to the higher brain.

The reality, of course, is that there is no neat distinction between the “higher” and “lower” parts of the brain. There are no neat distinctions between the “rational” mind and the “visceral” body. The mind is a much more complex network of feedback loops than accounted for in Gore’s simplistic pseudoscience.

Without emotions like fear, the “logical” mind can’t reach conclusions. On the other hand, many of the most vicious, genocidal acts are committed by people who are emotionally numb, not passionately out of control.

So, ironically, it is Gore himself who is being irrational -- according to Brooks.

But wait. Does Gore actually believe in this unscientific view of the human mind? Is the point of this book to wake us up and make us see that we've been manipulated by the media?

The other way of looking at the problem Brooks points out is that Gore is being quite rational, he understands very well that emotion and reason are intertwined, and he is using talk about rationality to manipulate our emotions. I think the use of that scary word "assault" in the title gives it away.

Be very afraid. Evil people want to control you -- assault you! --with invisible forces that play upon parts of your body that are beyond your conscious thought. I will protect you with this magical substance I have called Reason. Come to me. I will save you.

Two comments:

1. Odd that AlGore should be such a champion or rationality, considering that he's making his name these days as the leader of the all-too-irrational cult of global warming.

2. I've read comments by some of the writers of the original Trek on the character of Spock (Yep, he's a fanboy!--Ed.), and the character came out the way he did in part to fulfil a particular dramatic function, and in part because the actor (Leonard Nimoy) acted in a deliberately alien fashion to set him apart from the rest of the ensemble. Spock was supposed to be symbolic of rationality, just as McCoy was supposed to be symbolic of emotion. Their function in storytelling was be the exposition of Captain Kirk's internal thought processes--the captain would ask both for advice, and their conversation with the captain would dramatize the captain's decision-making.*

One of the writers (I think it was David Gerrold) said that while the Vulcans were portrayed as thinking themselves superior to the rest of us, their hyper-rationality actually made them inferior. I think that's right. History has shown that rationality without compassion leads to eugenics and all sorts of other nastiness.

The upshot of it is that Spock wasn't intended as a model for the next step in human evolution, and shouldn't be held up as such. I don't know how someone as irrational as AlGore could lead us to that promised land even if it were somewhere we really wanted to go.

*-Because of this dramatic necessity, both Spock and McCoy were unbalanced personalities. McCoy was over-emotional to the same degree that Spock was under-emotional.
Posted by:Mike

#5  "Al Gore thinks he's a Vulcan?"

I don't know if he's been Vulcanized or not, but he does resemble the Michelin Man. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-05-29 21:34  

#4  Maybe he's thinking of the old A.E Van Vogt "Null-A" series.

"Gilbert Gosseyn (get it?), The Man with two brains!"
Posted by: mojo   2007-05-29 16:34  

#3  Obviously Gore et al missed the entire arc of the Enterprise series. Vulcan intrigue and plots abound along with treaty violations, repression of dissidents, clandestine alliances with Romulan interlopers and an attempted administrative coup d'etat. Nothing that would make a Donk blink, but well short of the pinnacle of virtue.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-29 16:26  

#2  It's wartime. Don't we need a Romulan President?
Posted by: borgboy2001   2007-05-29 15:44  

#1  Interesting bit about Star Trek, but... I'm very confused... as until reading this, I never realized this was a fictional serie, I thought it was a documentary, just like Mission Impossible or The avengers.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-05-29 15:28  

00:00