You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caribbean-Latin America
Chavez Follows Zim-Bob's Lead in Giant Land Re-Distribution
2007-05-17
Or, Why 'Democracy' Always Eventually Fails
Clash of Hope and Fear as Venezuela Seizes Land

URACHICHE, Venezuela — The squatters arrive before dawn with machetes and rifles, surround the well-ordered rows of sugar cane and threaten to kill anyone who interferes. Then they light a match to the crops and declare the land their own.

For centuries, much of Venezuela’s rich farmland has been in the hands of a small elite. After coming to power in 1998, and especially after his re-election in December, President Hugo Chávez vowed to end that inequality, and has been keeping his promise in a process that is both brutal and legal.

Mr. Chávez is carrying out what may become the largest forced land redistribution in Venezuela’s history, building utopian farming villages for squatters, lavishing money on new cooperatives and sending army commando units to supervise seized estates in six states.

The violence has gone both ways in the struggle, with more than 160 peasants killed by hired gunmen in Venezuela, including several here in northwestern Yaracuy State, an epicenter of the land reform project, in recent years. Eight landowners have also been killed here.

“The oligarchy is always on the attack and trying to say you are no good,” Mr. Chávez said to squatters in a televised visit here. “They think they’re the owners of the world.”

Mr. Chávez’s supporters have formed thousands of state-financed cooperatives to wrest farms and cattle ranches from private owners. Landowners say compensation is hard to obtain. Local officials describe the land seizures as paving stones on “the road to socialism.”

“This is agrarian terrorism encouraged by the state,” said Fhandor Quiroga, a landowner and head of Yaracuy’s chamber of commerce, pointing to dozens of kidnappings of landowners by armed gangs in the last two years.

The government says the goal of the nationwide resettlement is to make better use of idle land and to make Venezuela less dependent on food imports. New laws allow squatters to manage and farm land that has now been placed in government hands.

Before the land reform started in 2002, an estimated 5 percent of the population owned 80 percent of the countryÂ’s private land. The government says it has now taken over about 3.4 million acres and resettled more than 15,000 families.

Poor farmhands and unemployed town dwellers who squatted on land here are as filled with optimism as wealthy land owners are with dread. On the outskirts of the town of Urachiche, for instance, is Fundo Bella Vista, a farming community inaugurated by Mr. Chávez during an episode of his television program broadcast here in April.

Bella Vista is one of 12 “communal towns” that Mr. Chávez plans to build this year. It has neat rows of identical three-bedroom homes for 83 families, a reading room, a radio station, a building with free high-speed Internet service, a school and a plaza with a bust of Simón Bolívar, Venezuela’s national hero.

With financing from state banks, the cooperative plants crops like manioc, corn and beans, which officials in Caracas say are better suited to soils here than sugar cane. By burning the cane during land seizures, the squatters prepare the land for other crops and give owners less incentive to fight for control. The state and federal government holds Bella Vista as an example of the ideological fervor Mr. Chávez is trying to instill in the countryside.

But while some of the newly settled farming communities are euphoric, landowners are jittery. Economists say the land reform may have the opposite effect of what Mr. Chavez intends, and make the country more dependent on imported food than before.
Amazing this slipped past the New York Times editor!
The uncertainties and disruptions of the land seizures have led to lower investment by some farmers. Production of some foods has been relatively flat, adding to shortages of items like sugar, economists say.
Posted by:Glenmore

#12  Hey Hugo - beat 3714% inflation, biatch!!
Posted by: Bob Mugabe   2007-05-17 23:32  

#11  not mean truthful
Posted by: sinse   2007-05-17 21:32  

#10  That's damn mean.

yep Fred-man gives every commie-lover a phat meanie.
Posted by: Red Dog   2007-05-17 19:28  

#9  NY Times'll buy that old oppression by the Kulaks story every time.

That's damn mean.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-17 18:17  

#8  Much better article in the WSJ today. Chavez is not turning land over to the poor, he's establishing collectives along the Soviet and Cuban models, with the same results.

Due to land seizures and price controls agricultural production has dropped and there are shortages of basic items such as milk and meat.
Posted by: DoDo   2007-05-17 17:57  

#7  aahhh just like the good ole days...

The NYT never met a Potemkin it didn't like! *Heart*
Posted by: Grigori Alexandrovich Potemkin   2007-05-17 15:08  

#6  The comments about burning the sugar cane are misleading. Cane is always burnt just before harvest to remove the huge amount of trash and pests, then it is cut. The cane is not harmed. This was preparation for stealing the crop, not sabotage. And after it is cut, the new owners will decide whether to grub out the roots to plant their corn and manioc, or sit back and let a new, lucrative, cane crop grow.
Posted by: Grunter   2007-05-17 14:35  

#5  Take it from me, this'll work out great, especially if the Times is covering it...
Posted by: The Ghost of Walter Duranty   2007-05-17 14:29  

#4  Here's a tip. If you are running low on sugar, quit burning down the goddamned sugar cane.

This has been done before, several times, and never works.
Posted by: Sneper the Wide5582   2007-05-17 14:25  

#3  NY Times'll buy that old oppression by the Kulaks story every time.
Posted by: Fred   2007-05-17 14:12  

#2  In an interview at the governorÂ’s palace, where the halls are decorated with images of Che Guevara and Mr. Chávez, Governor Giménez said some friction should be expected on “the road to socialism.”

Like...moving out of "palaces" maybe, guvnah?
Oh, right, that ain't happenin."Friction" is for the little people....
Posted by: tu3031   2007-05-17 13:26  

#1  Because it worked so well in Zimbabwe!
Posted by: Jonathan   2007-05-17 13:23  

00:00