You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Chlorine Bomb Kills 20 in Diyala Province Village
2007-05-16
'Religion of Peace'
Twenty people have been killed and 50 injured in a suspected chlorine bomb in Iraq's Diyala province, police say. The attack happened in an open-air market in the village of Abu Sayda at about 2000 (1600 GMT) on Tuesday.
The words you're looking for are "filthy war crime." So far I haven't seen the words come out of AI's or HRW's mouths. All the UN special rapporteurs have remained mum.
A police spokesman in the provincial capital Baquba said doctors at a local hospital believed the nature of victims' burns suggested poison gas. Use of chlorine bombs has become more common since the start of the year, says a BBC correspondent in Baghdad.
More common in Iraq, that is. As far as I know, it's the only place in the entire world where such filthy tactics are used.
Last month a bomb using chlorine and high explosive killed 35 people in Ramadi, west of the capital. Chlorine - widely used as a cleaner and purifier in areas of poor water sanitation - is easy to obtain in Iraq.
It's easy to obtain in most places. Most places still don't use it as a weapon.
Chlorine gas burns the skin on contact and can be fatal after a few breaths. In February the United States military reported finding a bomb factory near Falluja, where chlorine car bombs were being constructed. Diyala province - with its mixed Shia and Sunni Muslim population - has been the scene of frequent violence of a sectarian nature as well as attacks by anti-US insurgents.
Posted by:Glenmore

#7  I can't believe that I actually used to donate money to these worthless jackals.

Now that's the kind of metaphor that is simply insulting. Jackals hunt vermin. HRW defends vermin.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-05-16 22:29  

#6  So far I haven't seen the words come out of AI's or HRW's mouths.

And you won't. I can't believe that I actually used to donate money to these worthless jackals.
Posted by: DMFD   2007-05-16 21:18  

#5  Reading that makes me glad Saddam Hussein will never threaten the civilized world with WMD's - now if someone destroys Iran's nuclear weapons program the world will be a much safer place.
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723   2007-05-16 20:59  

#4  I want every country that (rightfully) complains about the suffering in Darfur to contribute troops to Diyala.

Here too we have the killing of the innocent.
Posted by: Captain America   2007-05-16 15:11  

#3  Where are those screaming about the Geneva Convention rights for inhuman savages who make war on their own using weapons banned by all civilized society?
Posted by: doc   2007-05-16 14:54  

#2  A viable silver lining. Thanks cp.
Posted by: ex-lib   2007-05-16 13:29  

#1  Something important to keep in mind. As the more capable leadership is picked off, those that remain are going to be the ones who are less disciplined and not quite so "strategic" in their thinking. These individuals are likely to perpetrate crimes that are unspeakable but in the longer term are going to do more harm than good for al Qaida.

So expect a spike in violence, a spike in the horrible nature of the crimes, but also expect them to be be rounded up at an increasing rate. People like that tend to be more emotional in their actions and this will lead to their killing or capture at an increasing rate.
Posted by: crosspatch   2007-05-16 12:12  

00:00