You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Good morning...
2007-05-15
'PU students want jihad, not music'Haniyeh accepts minister's resignationSaniora asks UNSC to impose Hariri tribunalTensions high as govt prepares for crackdown in Swat districtMullahs decree killed Uzbek militants are 'martyrs'U.S. says Padilla gave himself to al QaedaLil' Bro' to replace DadullahQaeda-linked group urges polls boycott in Algeria
Posted by:Fred

#6  I wish I could have helped her to strengthen her back musculature.
Posted by: Sonar   2007-05-15 17:09  

#5  Due to Fred's taste in page 1 art, I'm reading "Hollywood Portraits and how to take them" by Roger Hicks.

The Fred is more than a pundit, more than a coder, he's also a muse.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-05-15 17:06  

#4  Actually, this shot probably wasn't done on the first take, as 1920s-30s Hollywood photographers used surprisingly copious amounts of 8x10" negative film. Due to Fred's taste in page 1 art, I'm reading "Hollywood Portraits and how to take them" by Roger Hicks. And another thing-- due to the super-slow lens speeds of 8x10 cameras, photographers sought out poses that severely restricted the subjects' ability to move during the shot. Thus all the poses in big overstuffed chairs-- I suspect all of Billie's limbs had firm support on the furniture or her torso except for that left arm. 8x10 cameras are just too big to be used easily or conviently, but the huge size of the negative allows for a grain-free picture that can be retouched easily-- the key advantages of today's digital cameras and Photoshop.
Posted by: Throlush the Tiny3114   2007-05-15 13:56  

#3  Me.
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-15 05:58  

#2  Who is that under the sheet?
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-05-15 05:47  

#1  I do hope the photographer got that shot on the first take. That's a lovely pose, but an awfully awkward position to hold for very long, and most women's strength is not in their back musculature.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-15 04:23  

00:00