You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Newsweak Fraud: Bush 28% Poll Had 50% More Democrats
2007-05-08
(hat tip Captain's Quarters)

Newsweek publishes a breathless account of how George Bush's approval rating has dropped to 28%, and how leading Democrat contenders now outpoll the Republicans across the board for the 2008 presidential race. Coincidence, Newsweek asks? They should have asked that question of their pollsters:
ItÂ’s hard to say which is worse news for Republicans: that George W. Bush now has the worst approval rating of an American president in a generation, or that he seems to be dragging every Â’08 Republican presidential candidate down with him. But According to the new NEWSWEEK Poll, the publicÂ’s approval of Bush has sunk to 28 percent, an all-time low for this president in our poll, and a point lower than Gallup recorded for his father at Bush Sr.Â’s nadir. The last president to be this unpopular was Jimmy Carter who also scored a 28 percent approval in 1979. This remarkably low rating seems to be casting a dark shadow over the GOPÂ’s chances for victory in Â’08. The NEWSWEEK Poll finds each of the leading Democratic contenders beating the Republican frontrunners in head-to-head matchups. ...

Like Obama, Edwards defeats the Republicans by larger margins than Clinton does: the former Democratic vice-presidential nominee outdistances Giuliani by six points, McCain by 10 and Romney by 37, the largest lead in any of the head-to-head matchups. Meanwhile, Sen. Clinton wins 49 percent to 46 percent against Giuliani, well within the pollÂ’s margin of error; 50 to 44 against McCain; and 57 to 35 against Romney.

Yes, this would be a devastating poll, if one could rely on it. It contradicts nearly every other poll, which has consistently shown Giuliani beating Obama, Clinton, and Edwards. How could Newsweek get the results they have published?

Well, for one thing, it helps when you poll 50% more Democrats than Republicans. If one reads the actual poll results all the way to the end, the penultimate question shows that the sample has 24% Republicans to 36% Democrats. Compare that to the information given by Newsweek's NBC partners in February, which showed that party affiliation had shifted from a difference of less than a percentage point to a gap of 3.9 points -- 34.3% to 30.4%, with 33.9% independents.

Does it really surprise Newsweek that a sample where half again as many Democrats as Republicans were polled tend to prefer Democrats for President? Do they find it all that surprising that George Bush isn't terribly popular when surveys oversample Democrats? They knew that the poll had to have some problems; the margins of error for the poll were 7% for the Democrats and 8% for the Republicans, quite high for these kinds of polls.

Newsweek apparently doesn't employ people like editors and fact checkers before rushing their analyses to print. Thankfully, the blogosphere can take the time and effort to have these layers of correction so that we can provide the best possible information to our readership.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#7  Newsweek Poll II - Bush at 0% Approval (in a poll of our newsroom).
Posted by: DMFD   2007-05-08 21:12  

#6  To balance out the MSM's leftwing bias we need a network that is slanted just as far to the right - you would have to imagine a network which polls 50% more Republicans in their representation of the American people because no such network currently exists!
Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723   2007-05-08 19:24  

#5  Does anyone believe the MSM? They cannot be trusted with the news. One could put up statistics that shows the declining readership of MSM print media and the declining viewship of ABC, CBS, and NBC television news. More and more people are turning to the internet for their news. The MSM has been lying for years to push a liberal left agenda.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-05-08 16:26  

#4  The margin of error is plus/minus 7 percentage points for results based on 422 registered Democrats and Dem. leaners and plus/minus 8 percentage points for results based on 324 registered Republicans and Rep. leaners. In addition to sampling error, the practical difficulties of conducting surveys can also introduce error or bias to poll results.

Well, that's because there's more forward-looking, clear-thinking, well-educated, articulate Democrats than wild-eyed, raving lunatic, bible-thumping Rethuglicans, right?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-05-08 13:02  

#3  Time and Newsweek have not had reliable news since the 50s.
Nuf Said.
Posted by: 3dc   2007-05-08 12:15  

#2  And the MSM will continue to howl about the continued loss of readership/viewership blaming radio talk show conservatives and the net. Never ever will it be the crass bias and deceit they live by.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-05-08 11:48  

#1  Fact checkers tend to ruing the juiciest stories.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-05-08 11:03  

00:00