Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Politix | |
Trunks Could Bail in the Fall | |
2007-05-07 | |
![]() Some AP writer reading between the lines? House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Bush's troop increase deserves a chance and should be funded even if benchmarks for success are not met. Last week, Bush vetoed a $124 billion bill to pay for Iraq and Afghanistan operations in part because it required troops to begin returning home by Oct. 1. A senior House Democrat "We don't even have all of the 30,000 additional troops in Iraq yet, so we're supporting the president. We want this plan to have a chance of succeeding," Boehner said. "Over the course of the next three to four months, we'll have some idea how well the plan's working. Early signs are indicating there is clearly some success on a number of fronts," he said. But, he added, "By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn't, what's Plan B." That's "wavering", isn't it?
More spin at link. | |
Posted by:Bobby |
#4 Not to mention the troops still in Guam and Puerto Rico from the Spanish-American war. At least they finally got rid of the special telephone tax from that war (this year). |
Posted by: DMFD 2007-05-07 22:23 |
#3 There's 70,000 troops in Germany without a mission for the last 18 years. |
Posted by: ed 2007-05-07 15:40 |
#2 Headline: Boehner: GOP Support on Iraq Could Waver What he really said: "By the time we get to September or October, members are going to want to know how well this is working, and if it isn't, what's Plan B." That's not wavering. That's spin. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2007-05-07 15:36 |
#1 I'm still pissed at the donks 'cause the troops are still in Korea. That donk pres Truman went to war without an exit strategy. So did FDR, and Johnson, and Clinton, that pussy. |
Posted by: wxjames 2007-05-07 14:08 |