You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Illiteracy rate is climbing fast in China
2007-05-05

LIUPU, China — Last year, finally, everyone in Liupu village was able to read and write 1,500 Chinese characters, a census showed. Village leaders threw a big dinner to celebrate, presenting commemorative teacups to the last two adults to make the grade. But ask Zhao Huapu, the earnest principal of Liupu Shezu Girls School, how many people here can actually read and write, and he gives an embarrassed smile. Nearly 30 percent of Liupu’s adults are illiterate. “That’s just reality. ... A lot of them can’t read and write,” said Zhao, who acknowledged that the census is based on a test that fails to measure adult literacy accurately.

Illiteracy is increasing in China, despite a 50-year-old campaign to stamp it out and a declaration by the government in 2000 that it had been nearly eradicated. The reasons are complex, from the cost of a rural education to the growing appeal of migrant work that draws Chinese away from classrooms and toward far-off cities. In many cases, as in this farming hamlet in ChinaÂ’s southern Guizhou province, villagers whose education ended in elementary school have simply forgotten basic skills.
From 2000-05, the number of illiterate Chinese adults jumped by 33 percent, from 87 million to 116 million, the state-run China Daily reported this month. The newspaper noted that even before the increase, ChinaÂ’s illiterate population had accounted for 11.3 percent of the worldÂ’s total.

“The situation is worrying,” Gao Xbuegui, director of the Education Ministry’s illiteracy eradication office, told China Daily, blaming the increase on changing attitudes toward knowledge in a market economy. “Illiteracy is not only a matter of education but also has a great social impact.” Gao’s remarks echoed concerns voiced by literacy researchers and served as a reminder of the challenges facing China’s mostly rural population. This country is proud of its traditional focus on education, as well as more recent efforts to raise standards, such as passage of a law that says every child has the right to nine years of schooling. Yet in many rural areas, such schooling remains unavailable or prohibitively expensive.

In 2000, officials announced that the illiteracy rate in Tibet, the worst in China, had dropped to roughly 42 percent from 95 percent about 50 years earlier. From 2001-05, China educated nearly 10 million adults who couldnÂ’t read and write, the Education Ministry said in September. Authorities have also boasted of higher enrollment figures in primary and middle schools. Experts, however, contend that official reports are sometimes unreliable. Local officials are pressured to inflate enrollment figures, and students who are enrolled often donÂ’t bother to show up, they say. There are also questions about how literacy statistics are gathered. In Liupu, for example, Zhao and other local leaders go door-to-door each September, asking the villageÂ’s roughly 300 families how many people are in each household and what type of education they have. Those who can show they have graduated from primary school are not counted as illiterate, regardless of whether they can actually read or write.

Literacy in China is defined according to an exam taken in fourth grade. Even if villagers pass that exam, they frequently do not pursue further education. Having no reason to read and write, many forget the skills. This is especially true of ethnic minorities, rural women and young dropouts, according to researchers. “It’s undeniable that there’s a relapse, but what the number is, is hard to tell,” said Guo Hongxia, a scholar at the China National Institute for Educational Research. Hu Xingdou, a sociologist and professor of economics and China issues at Beijing Institute of Technology, suggested that the problem is related to the perceived benefits of education.

“Farmers don’t see a bright future from receiving more education,” he said. “Many believe it won’t help them much in making money. They also can’t afford to send their children to university, and a university degree no longer guarantees a job after graduation.”
When career advancement depends upon insider connections, what you know is of little worth compared to who you know.
Farmers are expected to learn at least 1,500 characters, according to state education regulations. Urban residents should master 2,000. Teachers in Beijing often tell students they need to know 3,000 characters to read a newspaper. College graduates are tested on 7,000 characters or more. In Liupu, located at the end of a three-mile-long, potholed dirt road, many of those who canÂ’t read and write are older, homebound women. Members of the Shezu ethnic minority, they speak their own dialect and have had little formal education. Researchers say that illiteracy is not confined to older generations, an assertion borne out in Liupu.

Zhao Xianghua, 15, said half of her friends can’t read. She boards during the week at a county school that charges $50 a year in tuition, but she has friends who don’t have the same luxury. “Several are already out working,” she said, “and when they come back to visit and we hang out, I can feel the distance between us.” The main test of literacy in China will be officials’ ability to follow up with students and cement any gains, said Hu, the professor, who complained that adults are often taught only how to pass a test. “It’s like planting trees to make a forest,” Hu said. “Many people plant trees, but few take care of them, and finally the trees die before becoming a forest.”
ChinaÂ’s reliance upon a complex and archaic ideographic alphabet is only part of the story. High illiteracy rates are the direct result of a government more focused upon military ascendancy than improving the daily life of its citizens. This is the true downside of elitismÂ’s inherent corruption and graft. Communism takes its toll in so many different ways. A system that relies upon an ignorant, untaught population to be more pliant and tractable is essentially committing a vast crime against humanity. Be certain that towering Chinese pride will obstruct any possible shift over to something so logical as English as a primary language. Imagine the huge drain upon resources that accompanies teaching, learning and using a vocabulary of between three and four thousand individual pictograms required for basic literacy.

China is only beginning to pay the piper for its monumental incompetence and ham-fisted mismanagement. Massive bad bank debt arising from insider networks is an economic millstone to the potential tune of one trillion dollars. The worldÂ’s worst medically caused AIDS epidemic promises a vast plague to come. With 16 out of 20 of the worldÂ’s most polluted cities, massive ecological damage is beginning to take its toll in respiratory disease and low quality of life. Ill-conceived and shoddily built civil engineering projects like Three Gorges Dam posing the unnerving prospect of manmade disasters on an unheard of scale. Copyright infringement, copycat theft of technology and institutionalized piracy of intellectual property stifle real innovation. Transfer of previously state-owned industries into the hands of PLA insiders with zero management skills has proven an economic disaster as well.

All of these horribly corrupt and avoidable catastrophes promise China one disaster after another in the near term. International corporations obsessed with bottom line profits continue to shutter their domestic industries in favor of steering jobs into ChinaÂ’s cheap labor pool. By flaunting sound management practices, manipulating its currency and avoiding even a pretense of ecological stewardship, China gains a hugely unfair economic and competitive advantage. The penalties for such sloth and mismanagement are not felt amid the higher echelons of the privileged elite, neither in China nor elsewhere. The shift of so many previously industrialized nations over to service based economies bespeaks a profound loss of manufacturing ingenuity and productivity that will be exceptionally difficult to re-establish once ChinaÂ’s bloated bubble economy finally implodes.

Posted by:Zenster

#14  You gotta wonder iff tasty Mexican burritos + Korean spicy squid will tame the Russkis.

I've often wondered the same myself.
Posted by: gorb   2007-05-05 23:44  

#13  Some of the money quotes from xbalanke's superb link. Be sure to read the whole article. It's one of the best I've seen in ages.

But China’s success is, at least in part, a mirage. True, 200 million of her subjects, fortunate to be working for an expanding global market, increasingly enjoy a middle-class standard of living. The remaining 1 billion, however, remain among the poorest and most exploited people in the world, lacking even minimal rights and public services. Popular discontent simmers, especially in the countryside, where it often flares into violent confrontation with Communist Party authorities. China’s economic “miracle” is rotting from within.

The Party’s primary concern is not improving the lives of the downtrodden; it seeks power more than it seeks social development. It expends extraordinary energy in suppressing Chinese freedoms—the media operate under suffocating censorship, and political opposition can result in expulsion or prison—even as it tries to seduce the West, which has conferred greater legitimacy on it than do the Chinese themselves.

The Communist Party is no less mendacious when it comes to China’s AIDS epidemic. The problem is gravest in the province of Henan, where vast numbers of poor peasants contracted AIDS during the nineties from selling their blood plasma (a trade generally controlled by Party members) and then having the blood, sans plasma but pooled with that of other donors, reinfused, absent HIV tests—a recipe for massive contamination. The AIDS sufferers of Henan are now dying in the hundreds of thousands, trapped in their impoverished villages with no one to care for them.

The governmentÂ’s initial reaction was to deny any problem, isolate AIDS-affected areas, and let the sick die (a pattern that initially repeated itself when SARS broke out in the country).
Police barred entry to the contaminated villages, and new maps of Henan appeared without the villages, as if they had vanished into thin air. But after the international press became aware of the growing crisis, the Party banned the blood trade (though it enforced the prohibition fitfully) and in 2000 at last officially acknowledged the existence of AIDS on Chinese soil.

Villagers often told me that it wasn’t the local Party secretary whom they most hated but rather the family-planning agents. To ensure the proper implementation of China’s single-child policy (in some provinces, the limit is two children, if the first is a girl), the agents keep close watch on childbearing women, often subjecting them to horrific violence. In 2005, a family-planning squad targeted the city of Linyi and its surrounding rural area, in the Shandong Province, because the population had far exceeded the Party’s child quota. The agents kidnapped 17,000 women, forcing abortions on those who were pregnant—in some cases, immersing seven- to eight-month-old fetuses in boiling water—and sterilizing those who weren’t. The agents tortured the Linyi men until they revealed the hiding places of their daughters and wives.

Many goods that China produces are worthless, Mao Yushi reminds me—especially those made by public companies. About 100,000 such Chinese enterprises continue to run in the old Maoist style, churning out substandard products because they’ve got to hit the targets that the Party sets and provide employment to those the Party cannot dismiss, not because they’re responding to any market demand. Most public-sector firms don’t even have real accounting procedures, so there’s no way of ascertaining profitability. “China is not a market economy,” Mao says bluntly.

The Party gives the banks lists of people to whom loans should go, and the rationale is frequently political or personal, not economic. Indeed, in many cases, banks are not to ask for repayment. That investment decisions obey political considerations and not the law of the market is the Chinese economyÂ’s central flaw, responsible at least in part, Mao Yushi believes, for the large number of empty office buildings and infrequently used new airports and an unemployment rate likely closer to 20 percent than to the officially acknowledged 3.5 percent.


Another factor that is rarely discussed involves the disparity between urban and rural wages. For first world nations like the USA, this gap is usually around 1.2:1 or 1.5:1 at most. China's has been assessed at anything from 3:1 to 5:1. Earlier sources addressing the 1990s have protrayed this key economic indicator at as much as 10:1 to a whopping 17:1. Even 3:1 competes with such economic hell holes as Zimbabwe or Middle East tyrannies.

It is this sort of income disparity that betrays China's dirty economic secrets. The 200 million citizens who enjoy a Western lifestyle do so at the detriment of the other ONE BILLION Chinese peasants. Many of that 200 million achieve their status only due to government paid expenses and subsidy for their services as political "aparatchiks".

China's image as an economic powerhouse is a vast facade in danger of crumbling at the least bit of destabilizing force. The West continues to prop up this monstrous regime and must share in the blame for its crimes against humanity.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-05 23:21  

#12  You gotta wonder iff tasty Mexican burritos + Korean spicy squid will tame the Russkis.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-05 22:58  

#11  Ditto for RUSSIA vv Gubmint failures in local mass-education efforts for citizens; + waves of LEGAL + ILLEGAL Muslim + Chinese + Norkie-Other Asian immigration, ala KOMMERSANT + GAZETA.RU.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-05-05 22:56  

#10  from and form, the and teh, and and nad, my most common, in that order.

Yea, untie! I garee, Zen. ;-)
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-05-05 22:15  

#9  Dyslexics of the world, UNTIE!
Posted by: Zenster   2007-05-05 21:24  

#8  It is, as Seafarious says, Lysdexia. I have a similar problem, and teh or hte are among my worst...
Posted by: Bobby   2007-05-05 21:11  

#7  btw - I meant no disrespect to you, Jackal, just teasing :-). I've had more than my share of misspellings, especially with "teh". For some reason my brain/fingers wanna type "the" out of order. How hard is "the" to type? Jeebus
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-05 20:19  

#6  LOL!
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-05 20:14  

#5  popularton = Number of imbeciles in a nation.
Posted by: Thavigum Turkeyneck9375   2007-05-05 20:08  

#4  popularton? :-)
Posted by: Frank G   2007-05-05 20:06  

#3  Or America, which has on 26 letters, but can't* seem to educate half its popularton.

* Or perhaps won't.
Posted by: Jackal   2007-05-05 19:19  

#2  For anyone interested in more on China: here's an excellent in-depth article that's well worth the time to read.
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-05-05 19:01  

#1  It must be mentioned that Red China uses a significantly simplified character set compared to classic Chinese, and yet cannot manage to educate a significant number of its people. Contrast this to Taiwan, which uses only classic Chinese, and yet according to the CIA World Factbook has a literacy rate of 96%.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-05-05 17:39  

00:00