You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan infant deaths fall by 40K/year since Taliban ouster
2007-04-29
Infant mortality in Afghanistan has fallen dramatically since the demise of the Taleban, according to a new study, with 40,000 fewer babies dying every year. Improvements in women's access to medical care since the Taleban were ousted from power five years ago was cited as the main reason for the death rate becoming significantly lower.
I blame George Bush.
According to the preliminary results of a Johns Hopkins University study, the infant mortality rate has declined to about 135 per 1,000 live births in 2006, down from an estimated 165 per 1,000 in 2001.
Dr. Steve is the expert on stats here, but I'll point out JHU was the same folks who gave us the Lancet Iraq deaths travesty. It's not a 'lection year, so these good numbers are allowed to slip out.
Looks like different people did the survey, and it was coordinated by the Ministry of Health. This NYT article on the same subject notes that the estimated improvement is likely conservative, so things must really be better.
The researchers "found improvements in virtually all aspects of care in almost every province," the public health ministry and World Bank said in a joint statement on the findings. Mohammad Amin Fatimi, Afghanistan's public health minister, said the news was welcomed. "Despite many challenges, there are clear signs of health sector recovery and progress throughout the country," he said. "But there is a long way to go to provide access to basic health services for Afghans in far remote, under-served and marginalised areas across the country. These infants are the future builders of our country."

Benjamin Loevinsohn, a World Bank health specialist, said the survey results probably underestimated the improvement in infant mortality. "It's a conservative estimate. This is the situation two and a half to three years ago ... It should be better than that now," Mr Loevinsohn said. He said children were benefiting from a push in 2004 to improve health care and access to vaccinations for diseases such as measles, polio and tetanus.

The researchers studied more than 600 health facilities annually since 2004. Doctors and health professionals visited 8,278 households, using a standardised questionnaire to interview one mother per household about her birth history. The study found the number of women receiving prenatal care increased to 30 per cent in 2006 from 5 per cent in 2003. Nineteen per cent of pregnant women were attended by a skilled health worker last year, up from only 5 per cent in 2003.

The survey was conducted in 29 of the country's 34 provinces - excluding Helmand, Uruzgan, Kandahar, Zabul and Nuristan because of security concerns, Mr Loevinsohn said.

The ministry is working to set up small clinics, deploy mobile teams in remote rural areas, expand community midwifery training, and increase the number of female staff at health facilities.

However Afghanistan still has one of the world's highest maternal mortality rates. One in 60 Afghan women dies of pregnancy-related causes, said UN Population Fund executive director Thoraya Ahmed Obaid. "No woman should die giving life," she said during a visit to Afghanistan this week. "No nation can be developed when its women are dying giving birth."
Good luck, Afghanistan. And thank you to the armed forces and other NATO assets who helped bring this change into being.
Posted by:Seafarious

#6  In the America I grew up in, this news would be reason enough to continue occupation and install friendly puppet governments to facilitate the impovement of the medical conditions inside the target country. Improved education and religious missionaries would follow.
Today, however, the democrats must destroy any and all such improvements to further their anti-Bush agenda. The democrat party has indeed turned the corner. They offer nothing but criticism and opposition. They are an embarrassment. The media should be ashamed for what they have allowed to pass for leadership.
I strongly urge all Americans to take back America. Silence the MSM, close the borders, develope alternative fuel sources, and slay the dragon of corruption, the democrat party.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-04-29 19:52  

#5  My first thought upon seing the headline, was preempted by Zenster.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-04-29 14:19  

#4  I have made an observation regarding infant mortality: high survival rates correlate with high rates of war. Prolonged peace correlates with low birth rates. Both seem like both a cause and an effect.
If I hazard a guess, war results when infant mortality falls below the long-term stability level for a population, and if war is long enough and deadly enough it leads to compensating increased birth levels. But beyond some critical catastrophic level of war populations collapse and cultures vanish (e.g. American Indians or post-1918 French.) What does this say about the conflict between Islam and the West?
Corrolary: when a society invests too many of its eggs (literally) in too few baskets it becomes extremely risk-averse, but ironically this risk-aversion actually does not lead to better long-term survivability - so how did it evolve?
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-29 08:55  

#3  What Zen said. Or else these will be an extra 40K per year Talibunnies themselves in 15-20 years.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-29 08:39  

#2  Yes, Bless Afghanistan.
Posted by: newc   2007-04-29 03:43  

#1  Let's up Taliban kills to 40K per year to make space for the surviving babies.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-04-29 03:18  

00:00