Submit your comments on this article | ||
Iraq | ||
Dems Think They Can "Win" Iraq Vote | ||
2007-04-25 | ||
"Win" the vote. Oh, the Irony! House Democratic leaders predict they will have enough votes to pass legislation requiring U.S. troops to begin leaving Iraq by Oct. 1 and send it on to President Bush for his promised veto. Several House members said they would go along with the bill negotiated with the Senate in a bid for party unity despite their desire for an earlier, binding withdrawal date. The House vote scheduled Wednesday would come as the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, and other defense officials try to convince lawmakers that a timetable would push Iraq into chaos. Bush's promise guarantees a showdown with Democrats emboldened by last year's election, which handed them control of Congress. ![]() And YOU want to be accountable for what follows, Madam Speaker?
"Some Democratic leaders seem to believe that blind opposition to the new strategy in Iraq is good politics," Cheney told reporters at the Capitol after attending the weekly Republican policy lunch. "Senator Reid himself has said that the war in Iraq will bring his party more seats in the next election." "It is cynical to declare that the war is lost because you believe it gives you political advantage," Cheney said. A mastery of understatement. Reid, D-Nev., dismissed Cheney's comments. "I'm not going to get into a name-calling match with the administration's chief attack dog," he told reporters. Good comeback, Harry. You called him a name.
| ||
Posted by:Bobby |
#14 FREEREPUBLIC/DRUDGE/LUCIANNE > DOW PASSES 13,000-MARK. Which IMO is why the Dems are pushing, at least on the MSM, for "timetables", etal - want the MSM credit come Jan 2009 iff a Dem wins the WH. Iff Dubya refuses to stop entrenching, + does NOT invade Iran, and Radical Islam fails to initiate any type Amer Hiroshima(s)/new 9-11's inside America, PCORRECTNESS > DEMS = MOUD-MULLAHS > BOTH HAVE TO CHANGE FOCII TOWARDS PRESERVING LOCAL POLITICAL POWER-ADVANTAGE, which for the Dems means taking credit for Dubya's successes/agenda in the ME, i.e. US/US-Allied flags all around Radical Iran. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-04-25 23:39 |
#13 thanks Dave for planting the seed of the mental visual.....that is enough to make somebody quit smoking, just so you have no trading material..... |
Posted by: USN, Ret. 2007-04-25 18:09 |
#12 It would take a bunch of morons to not take this vote and veto and turn it against the Dems in 2008. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-04-25 14:42 |
#11 This is what the Democrats want:![]() To them, America is not America if it isn't depressed, discouraged, insecure, pitiful and needy. Emo Nation, that's what they're after. |
Posted by: Dave D. 2007-04-25 12:57 |
#10 Verlaine - it's an insult because if differs from the official MSM position. |
Posted by: Bobby 2007-04-25 12:30 |
#9 "It is cynical to declare that the war is lost because you believe it gives you political advantage," Cheney said. Get him, Dick! Sic him, boy! |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2007-04-25 11:56 |
#8 "The White House and Democrats traded insults" What? Where's the "insult" in the Veep's description of Reid's position? Meanwhile, where's the substance in Reid's comment - oh, right, there is none, it's just an insult. Sickening. |
Posted by: Verlaine 2007-04-25 11:23 |
#7 I sure as hell hope so, too. But they are clearly convinced it's the key to their future success, and they're going for broke. God help us all if they win. |
Posted by: Dave D. 2007-04-25 10:25 |
#6 I hope all this plotting, scheming, sedition and treason bites the dems in the ass come election time. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2007-04-25 10:13 |
#5 Keep the scarf on. It hides Nancy's lift scars. |
Posted by: ed 2007-04-25 09:50 |
#4 The 20th century demonstrated that tyrants often get 99 or 100 percent votes all the time. However, the electorate didn't seem to be as willing to give their last full measure of devotion when the time came to defend them. That is the true vote. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-04-25 09:30 |
#3 ... cigarettes in exchange for a--- no, no, NO. Don't want to follow that train of thought... |
Posted by: Dave D. 2007-04-25 08:38 |
#2 Ditch the scarf, Nancy. You look like you should be standing by the side of the road in Sicily begging GI's to toss you cigarettes... |
Posted by: tu3031 2007-04-25 08:29 |
#1 Dingy Harry is an ass kissing, fallacious, SOB. He never talked like this when Clinton was is the White House. It was "cut and rip" then. Why are we to believe that he is a peace lover now. |
Posted by: Spats Elminens9992 2007-04-25 07:38 |