| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Ismail Ax: The Shooter Was Another 'Son of Sacrifice' |
| 2007-04-19 |
| Posted by:BrerRabbit |
| #2 News Film footage > "Joseph and Seung-Hui"??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-04-19 21:19 |
| #1 This comment from the "gates of Vienna" kind of says it all: "It is rather interesting how Cho Seung-hui is being proclaimed by the mainstream media as insane, as a paranoid young man driven by delusion, hatred, and violence. Such misogyny, such paranoia, such violence, such an Oedipus Complex a mile wide, and such a desire for fame to send his manifesto to a news organization before he murders innocent people on an industrial scale. We are told how such a mentality is so difficult to imagine, that no sane person could ever act like that reclusive student in Virginia. Other men act just like Cho Seung-hui and they aren’t regarded as insane at all. Instead, these same acts are portrayed as acts of Muslim religious expression. For the rest of us, the actions of Cho Seung-hui are declared to be insane. Yet when Muslim fanatics act exactly the same way, any criticism of the insanity of such people is swept under the rug and declared to be “Islamophobia”. Were the mentality and actions of Cho Seung-hui really more insane than the rambling manifestos of Osama bin Laden or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? Am I supposed to believe that when a man becomes a suicidal mass murderer, it means he is insane unless he is a Muslim? Must I regard such misbehavior as insane only when non-Muslims are doing it? Either Cho Seung-hui is not quite so insane as the media portrays him to be, or there is something seriously wrong with Islam." |
| Posted by: no mo uro 2007-04-19 17:45 |