You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
The Disappearing Male
2007-04-10
A new study from the University of Pittsburgh has found that during the past thirty years, the number of male births has steadily decreased in the U.S. and Japan. Perhaps more worryingly, the study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives, also found that an increasing proportion of fetuses that die are male. In Japan, among the fetuses that die, two-thirds are male, up from just over half in 1970.

The study reported an overall decline of 17 males per 10,000 births in the U.S. and a decline of 37 males per 10,000 births in Japan since 1970. Lead investigator Devra Lee Davis said the figures translated to 135,000 fewer males in the U.S. and 127,000 fewer males in Japan.

Davis suggests that environmental factors may be one explanation for the shrinking male birth rate. "The pattern of decline in the ratio of male to female births remains largely unexplained," she explained. "We know that men who work with some solvents, metals and pesticides father fewer baby boys. We also know that nutritional factors, physical health and chemical exposures of pregnant women affect their ability to have children and the health of their offspring. We suspect that some combination of these factors, along with older age of parents, may account for decreasing male births."

The study notes that prenatal exposure to endocrine disrupting environmental pollutants may impact the SRY gene - a gene on the Y chromosome that determines the sex of a fertilized egg. Other environmental factors that also may affect the viability of a male fetus include the parents' weight, nutrition and the use of alcohol and drugs.

"Given the importance of reproduction for the health of any species, the trends we observed in the U.S. and Japan merit concern," said Davis. "In light of our findings, more detailed studies should be carried out that examine sex ratio in smaller groups with defined exposures as a potential indicator of environmental contamination."
Posted by:anonymous5089

#8  My household contained three ovulating females for a number of years. They almost always were on the same cycle - might be off for a month or two if they'd been apart a while (e.g. college), but then, they'd snap back together. Made for some 'interesting' times for me.
Anyway, perhaps there's some similar phenomenon that drives whether males or females are conceived - if there's a critical mass of some male pheromone circulating then the male-making sperm get 'lazy' and the female-makers do the conceiving, or vise versa.
Curious that the modern Norwegian or 'metrosexual' population seems more than adequate hormonally to stifle the male-making sperm.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-10 19:23  

#7  BS: the masculinity rate is someting who is very constant except that curiouly it is higher after wars. Maximum ever registered was 109 (109 boys for 100 giorls) and never went below 103.

Of course this assumes there is no selective abortion.
Posted by: JFM   2007-04-10 16:30  

#6  A friend of mine had 3 daughters (2 different fathers) and 2 of those daughters have had 6 kids (one with same husband, one with different), 5 of whom were boys. (oldest kid is 9)

"We know that men who work with some solvents, metals and pesticides father fewer baby boys."

And what percentage of either US or Japanese men is that? I'm betting small. Yeesh.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-04-10 16:20  

#5  That's funny. My group of friends, 20 in all, that the females were pregnant and 19 of 'em were boys (including my own son). I blame something in the water....
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-04-10 15:48  

#4  There's a joke in here somewhere about 'disappearing male' and jumping into really cold water, but I'll leave that for others to find.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-04-10 14:57  

#3  So how is this a bad thing?
Posted by: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton   2007-04-10 13:34  

#2  Tie this story to the one on Muslim rapes in Norway (and the lack of response to them) and one has the potential for an excellent research project. Examine Norse estrogen exposure relative to societies that actually oppose rape and see if there's a correlation.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-04-10 13:27  

#1  Could estrogen and artificial hormones and such, introduced during pregnancy, be causing this?

Feel free to shoot me down on this one; my girlfriend's big on avoiding artificial junk in food, and she tells me horror stories about what such things do to the body, but I don't know how much of it is accurate and how much is hysteria, and I'm too lazy to do the research to find out . . .
Posted by: The Doctor   2007-04-10 13:15  

00:00