You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Why So Gloomy?
2007-04-09
From Newsweak, Go figure! RTWT
Judging from the media in recent months, the debate over global warming is now over. There has been a net warming of the earth over the last century and a half, and our greenhouse gas emissions are contributing at some level. Both of these statements are almost certainly true. What of it? Recently many people have said that the earth is facing a crisis requiring urgent action. This statement has nothing to do with science. There is no compelling evidence that the warming trend we've seen will amount to anything close to catastrophe.

What most commentators—and many scientists—seem to miss is that the only thing we can say with certainly about climate is that it changes. The earth is always warming or cooling by as much as a few tenths of a degree a year; periods of constant average temperatures are rare. Looking back on the earth's climate history, it's apparent that there's no such thing as an optimal temperature—a climate at which everything is just right. The current alarm rests on the false assumption not only that we live in a perfect world, temperaturewise, but also that our warming forecasts for the year 2040 are somehow more reliable than the weatherman's forecast for next week.
Posted by:Frank G

#6  It's now suspected that insects are cooling the world off faster than man can warm it up.
We have 3 options; Negotiate with them. Attack and destroy them. Or try to live with a little chill.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-04-09 21:54  

#5  So mote it be.
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-04-09 16:35  

#4  RJS - nmu means the religion of global warming.
Posted by: SR-71   2007-04-09 16:08  

#3  no mo uru
I have a question. Did you mean "Man made global warming" or simply global warming?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-04-09 12:58  

#2  Global warming is the triple intersection of the following sets:

1. Luddism.
2. Socialism.
3. Government hyper-regulation of entrepreneurship.

Any questions?
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-04-09 06:47  

#1  D ***ng it, the Earth's resources are limited, ergo CONSERVATION [ala Kyoto] > the USA has to unilater give up its consumerist materialist arrogant obese Amer way-of-life while weak or dev nations can waste and pollute all they want - THE UNIONS' WILL SAVE THEM??? We have to make it absolutely undeniably undoubtedly categorically unequivocally clear to the Amer people - WE ARE WASTASERVING/CONSERVAWASTING ala Kyoto, D *** YOU, AND DON'T YOUSE FERGIT IT!
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-04-09 02:55  

00:00