Submit your comments on this article | |
Arabia | |
Kuwaiti father slit his daughter's throat | |
2007-04-08 | |
KUWAIT CITY -- A Kuwaiti father who killed his 13-year-old daughter by slitting her throat was Saturday ruled "not responsible for his actions" and ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment. The court ruling, which can be appealed, was based on a report by a special medical commission which concluded that he was mentally ill. Adnan Al Enezi, 40, blindfolded and handcuffed his daughter Asmaa in January 2005 before murdering her because he thought she was no longer a virgin. During the killing, Enezi changed the first knife for another with a sharper blade while his daughter bled and screamed in pain and as her two brothers and a sister looked on.
| |
Posted by:Steve White |
#10 Good digging on the name, Sea. We've talked about this mook before. |
Posted by: Steve White 2007-04-08 13:03 |
#9 I have to go with the Saudis on this one, "Yep he's crazy, Execution is Wednesday." |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2007-04-08 12:12 |
#8 There's a special place in hell for this lousy POS. Not to mention the sub-human siblings who watched and did nothing. |
Posted by: Charles 2007-04-08 11:03 |
#7 Forensic examinations later proved that Asmaa was still a virgin. Which proves he cannot have been in his right mind. Of course, if that cat-meat had not been a virgin than it would have been Allan holding the knife. The hell with these savages. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2007-04-08 09:58 |
#6 Maybe he had just smoked too much methamphetamine. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-04-08 09:54 |
#5 Here's one of the original reports. |
Posted by: Seafarious 2007-04-08 09:51 |
#4 from other reports, Adnan Al Enezi was an employee with the Islamic Affairs Ministry; also the daughter was 14 in some reports. |
Posted by: mhw 2007-04-08 09:45 |
#3 Look up Enezi in the RB archives. |
Posted by: Seafarious 2007-04-08 09:41 |
#2 Members of the more radical cults of the Muslim religion are insane and thus "not responsible for their actions." KSM, for instance, is 'innocent by reason of insanity.' Logical, right? |
Posted by: Glenmore 2007-04-08 08:51 |
#1 Sorta makes you wonder what he'd have to do to get convicted. |
Posted by: gorb 2007-04-08 03:24 |