Submit your comments on this article |
Iraq |
Dozens Killed in Revenge Attack in Iraq |
2007-03-29 |
![]() The killings occurred in the mixed Shiite-Sunni city Tal Afar. The gunmen roamed Sunni neighborhoods in Tal Afar through the night, shooting at residents and homes, according to police and a local Sunni politician. Witnesses said relatives of the Shiite victims in the truck bombings broke into Sunni homes and killed the men inside or dragged them out and shot them in the streets. Gen. Khourshid al-Douski, the Iraqi army commander in charge of the area, said 70 were shot in the back of the head and 40 people were kidnapped. A senior hospital official in Tal Afar, who spoke on condition of anonymity out of security concerns, said 45 men were killed. Outraged Sunni groups blamed Shiite-led security forces for the killings. Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's office ordered an investigation and the U.S. command offered to provide assistance. Ali al-Talafari, a Sunni member of the local Turkomen Front Party, said the Iraqi army had arrested 18 policemen accused in the shooting rampage after they were identified by Sunni families. Shiite militiamen also took part, he said. The revenge killings among Shiites in the religiously mixed city 260 miles northwest of Baghdad were triggered by truck bombings in Tal Afar on Tuesday that killed 80 people and wounded 185. Al-Douski said one of the trucks exploded after the driver lured people in a predominantly Shiite neighborhood to the site by telling them he was distributing free flour from a humanitarian organization. The bombing caused surrounding buildings to collapse, leaving huge piles of concrete and bricks dusted with white flour. |
Posted by:Steve White |
#10 but not enough died!! Damn it~~!!! |
Posted by: Saveababykillademocrat 2007-03-29 00:01 |
#9 I now feel complete Zenster . :p |
Posted by: MacNails 2007-03-29 11:59 |
#8 Wasn't this one considered to be an AQI operation? At this time, it may be impossible to prove but it sure reeks of their tactics. I dunno, I'd think by now the Sunni's would be getting tired of this shit. |
Posted by: DepotGuy 2007-03-29 10:16 |
#7 What a useful and clear definition! ;-) |
Posted by: trailing wife 2007-03-29 09:20 |
#6 ROP |
Posted by: Darrell 2007-03-29 09:14 |
#5 After the Death by Sewage incident I can say I officially no longer care what these savages do to each other. Provided we carefully restrict air travel and are thorough about bombing anything that uses electricity in their desert strongholds I see no impediment to allowing them to slaughter each other at will. In fact, I see a Running Man style reality tv opportunity for Chinese or Japanese markets; those countries being less dainty at enjoying the suffering of others than we have become. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2007-03-29 09:00 |
#4 May i have a faaat-waaaaah on that please Zenster . Your word is good but needs allan's stamp of approval. I faaat-waaaaah in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries! Other than that, I really appreciate your sincere interest, MacNails. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-03-29 07:23 |
#3 May i have a faaat-waaaaah on that please Zenster . Your word is good but needs allan's stamp of approval . |
Posted by: MacNails 2007-03-29 06:37 |
#2 It also must be added that any innocent blood relative of the offending tribe all the way out to a third cousin twice removed (age & sex irrespective of course) is a fair target. |
Posted by: Broadhead6 in Iraq 2007-03-29 06:09 |
#1 Dozens Killed in Revenge Attack in Iraq Let's get one thing perfectly clear. If your murderous assault upon a rival clan does not involve a hereditery blood feud less than five centuries old it is, at best, merely a recent dispute worthy of small claims court and cannot possibly be recognized as any sort of valid "revenge attack". In order to qualify as a true Revenge Attack™ the contested claim must center upon a half-millennia old dispute involving either the hair's-breadth loss of a prestigious camel race, a goat prized for its particularly intimate qualities or some infintesimally minute region of sand unique in its ability to soak up huge quantities of needlessly shed blood such that it might qualify at all. Any of the above must have happened at least five centuries ago to assert any possible claim in a court of Islamic law. Any questions? |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-03-29 02:02 |