You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Murtha Stumbles, Dems Mumble
2007-02-25
WaPo, but page A05.
The plan was bold: By tying President Bush's $100 billion war request to strict standards of troop safety and readiness, Democrats believed they could grab hold of Iraq war policy while forcing Republicans to defend sending troops into battle without the necessary training or equipment.

But a botched launch by the plan's author, Rep. John P. Murtha (Pa.), has united Republicans and divided Democrats, sending the latter back to the drawing board just a week before scheduled legislative action, a score of House Democratic lawmakers said last week. "If this is going to be legislation that's crafted in such a way that holds back resources from our troops, that is a non-starter, an absolute non-starter," declared Rep. Jim Matheson (Utah), a leader of the conservative Blue Dog Democrats.

Murtha's credentials as a Marine combat veteran, a critic of the war and close ally of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) were supposed to make him an unassailable spokesman for Democratic war policy. Instead, he has become a lightning rod for criticism from Republicans and members of his own party. Freshman Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.), a retired Navy admiral who was propelled into politics by the Iraq war, said Murtha could still salvage elements of his strategy, but Sestak, an outspoken war opponent, is "a bit wary" of a proposal that would influence military operations. "I was recently in the military, and I have to speak from that experience," Sestak said.

Murtha acted on his own to craft a complicated legislative strategy on the war, without consulting fellow Democrats. When he chose to roll out the details on a liberal, antiwar Web site on Feb. 15, he caught even Pelosi by surprise while infuriating Democrats from conservative districts.
The story of Murtha's star-crossed plan illustrates the Democratic Party's deep divisions over the Iraq war and how the new House majority has yet to establish firm control over Congress. From the beginning, Murtha acted on his own to craft a complicated legislative strategy on the war, without consulting fellow Democrats. When he chose to roll out the details on a liberal, antiwar Web site on Feb. 15, he caught even Pelosi by surprise while infuriating Democrats from conservative districts.

Then for an entire week, as members of Congress returned home for a recess, Murtha refused to speak further. Democratic leaders failed to step into the vacuum, and
Republicans relentlessly attacked a plan they called a strategy to slowly bleed the war of troops and funds.
Republicans relentlessly attacked a plan they called a strategy to slowly bleed the war of troops and funds. By the end of the recess, Murtha's once promising strategy was in tatters.

Tom Andrews, a former House member and antiwar activist who helped Murtha with his Internet rollout, fumed: "The issue to me is, what is the state of the backbone of the Democratic Party? How will they respond to this counterattack? Republicans are throwing touchdown passes on this because the Democrats aren't even on the field."

Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, a Florida Democrat and deputy whip, said party leaders are working on several Iraq proposals and that Murtha's may survive. Finding consensus will be difficult but not impossible, she said. "This is a multi-step process," she cautioned. "At least we're debating the topic, not blindly following the president." Megan Grote, Murtha's spokeswoman, said the congressman will not discuss Iraq policy until a news conference scheduled for the end of the week.
Posted by:Bobby

#23  Farewell Murtha, ye hardly knew jack.
Posted by: WTF   2007-02-25 18:43  

#22  but Sestak, an outspoken war opponent, is "a bit wary" of a proposal that would influence military operations. "I was recently in the military, and I have to speak from that experience," Sestak said.

LOL! That's got to be one of the funniest things I've ever read. I was under the impression that one of the main reasons Sestak got into politics was so he could influence military operations after being fired by Mullen. Oh the irony is so rich it is almost as good as a hot fudge brownie sundae.
Posted by: Thromoger Thrumble5163   2007-02-25 16:32  

#21  ...Murtha belongs in a nursing home not congress.

Murtha has that same look in his eyes my Grand Father had the last few months of his life. He was stark raving mad with dementia the last 6 months.

I suspect Murtha is as well.
Posted by: Chiper Threreger8956   2007-02-25 15:43  

#20  Then for an entire week ... Murtha refused to speak further. If he did so voluntarily, it's probably the wisest thing he's done in his 32 years in congress. But I still believe Murtha belongs in a nursing home not congress.
Posted by: GK   2007-02-25 15:33  

#19  The Dems have declared war on the President and the WoT, and this nation. So every time that dems like Nancy or Jack [pflegm] start undermining the war effort, the troops, and the nation, it is the duty of Republicans and Independents to attack their statements and put them in their place, just like Chaney did last week. This is a war in Congress, just like that in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is just a little different enemy. Just remember that the Dems treat this partisan politics as a war, no holds barred.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-02-25 14:55  

#18  
Posted by: Angenter Crolugum3645   2007-02-25 14:45  

#17  My Dad too CF, for every office but President, and usually even then.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-02-25 12:27  

#16  No Dave, like my mom, when they see Democratic Party they think Scoop Jackson, Sam Nunn, John F. Kennedy.... etc....

And the MSM does a good job of masking the true leaders of the DNC.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-02-25 12:07  

#15  What I just don't get is, how anyone who has dedicated his life to this country's defense, and to the defense of our Constitution, can embrace the politics of today's Democratic Party. Are they unaware that "Scoop" Jackson, Sam Nunn, and other Democrat hawks are long gone? Are they unaware that the Party has been taken over lock, stock and barrel by the extreme far Left? The Kossacks, the DUmmies, the MoveOn.orcs and the MooreOns are now calling the shots. Didn't they notice that John "Buddyfucker" Kerry was their Party's Presidential nominee in 2004, and that at their convention that same year, the highest seats of honor (*SPIT*) were given to Jimmy Carter and (*SPIT*) Michael Moore?

Does it not occur to them that it ain't their father's Democratic Party anymore?

Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-25 12:03  

#14  Dave, even though the Dems are in a struggle for the ruling elite,I may have mispoke about this guy. Thanks for the correction, would hate to say something nice about a clinton dem. Me thinks popcorn will be in order as the dems fight it out for power amongst themselves.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2007-02-25 11:42  

#13  The culture of botching slinks along to oblivion.
Posted by: Phineter Thraviger   2007-02-25 10:51  

#12  
Posted by: Jesing Ebbease3087   2007-02-25 10:46  

#11  Finaly, I was beginning to think lunacy was the norm with ALL the Dems.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-25 10:29  

#10  True. Though me being me, I'd prefer "bash" rather than "erode"...
Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-25 10:08  

#9  That's as may be, Dave D, but the key point of Representative Sestak's statement, intentional or not (and it probably wasn't), is to erode Rep. Murtha's credentials as a "war hero". After all, he was a Marine ever so long ago, and as a result can't possibly be expected to understand the needs of the modern military... just as Senator John Kerry's Viet Nam experience is unconnected to the realities of the current war. Neat, yes?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-02-25 09:52  

#8  Murtha's position is the first bargaining position. Anything the Donks come up with is going to be seen as a "compromise" between that and what the Publicans want.

Politix is defined as "the art of compromise." You heard read it here first.
Posted by: Fred   2007-02-25 09:38  

#7  It was a botched launch joke...
Posted by: John Kerry   2007-02-25 09:27  

#6  I'd be a helluva lot more comfortable with Joe Sestak if he were more than merely "a bit wary" of destructive proposals like Murtha's; he ought to be blasting them as "foolish, irresponsible and asinine".

Why in the world anybody coming out of the military would run for public office as a Democrat is beyond me.

Although with Sestak, the answer is fairly clear from this sentence in one of his campaign mailings: "A former 3-star Admiral, Joe served as President Clinton's Director for Defense Policy in the White House."

*SPIT*

Posted by: Dave D.   2007-02-25 09:01  

#5  "I was recently in the military, and I have to speak from that experience," Sestak said.

As guys start to get out of the mil and enter public service we can expect to see more of this. The Dems are doomed.
Posted by: 49 Pan   2007-02-25 08:45  

#4  keep going, Jack, pretty soon you'll be radioactive and even Pelosi will avoid you
Posted by: Frank G   2007-02-25 08:40  

#3  Murtha lied, and more of our troops died.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-25 08:19  

#2  Murtha stumbled, people mumbled!
Posted by: JFM   2007-02-25 08:01  

#1  Oh, I ommitted the Sub-Headline -

Democrats Were Ill-Prepared for Unplanned Disclosure, Republican Attacks

As opposed to "Murtha makes a fool of himself."
Posted by: Bobby   2007-02-25 07:45  

00:00