You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq Terror Groups Offer Non-Binding Ceasefire
2007-02-18
Scrappleface. Sometimes you actually have to look before you can tell for sure.
A coalition of major terror groups operating in Iraq today announced a symbolic, non-binding ceasefire in response to House DemocratsÂ’ passage of a non-binding resolution rejecting President George BushÂ’s troop surge plan.

Al Qaeda in Iraq, the Shiite Mahdi army and representatives of a Sunni car-bomb cartel said they would continue to fully fund martyrdom operations, with help from their friends in Iran, Syria and elsewhere.

An unnamed spokesman for the terror coalition said, “The non-binding ceasefire serves as a kind of imaginary turning point in the mythical pursuit of peace among those who have pledged their lives to the destruction of the U.S., Christianity, Judaism and Western civilization in general.”

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, said the terrorists’ symbolic initiative “confirms that Democrats are on the right track with their strategy to end the war in Iraq through non-binding means.”

Meanwhile, the White House released a conciliatory statement from President George Bush in the wake of the Democrat-sponsored anti-surge resolution.

“Our friends in Congress continue to display the rich diversity of patriotism,” the president said. “Their actions demonstrate to all Americans that you, in fact, can support the troops while opposing the war, as long as you’re not too specific about whose troops you support.” heh

Mr. Bush also said the House vote “shows that it’s possible to pass a resolution without being overly resolute.” heh heh
Posted by:cajunbelle

#5  Satire so laser-sharp that I got a cut on my eyeball just reading it.
Posted by: Sic_Semper_Tyrannus   2007-02-18 18:01  

#4  We may threaten to pull the funding from these Iraq terrorists groups. First the non-binding ceasefire.

Love these scrapplefaces. :)
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-02-18 15:54  

#3  Not too nay yarns ago when var Lefty pundits argued Amer should hire out our national defense to foreign nations, espec Russia-China. At same time, the Commies should have a major say in the future OWG in order to "counterbalance" or "counterweigh" Amer influence in the new OWG. IOW, Amer can control = rule OWG as long as somebody else has all our guns [not controlling = ruling at all].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-02-18 02:10  

#2  #1 Steve S. - Whaddaya mean now?
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-02-18 00:32  

#1  I realize the organizational boundaries and alliances between the various terrorist groups are fluid, but are the Democrats considered to part of Al Qaeda now?
Posted by: SteveS   2007-02-18 00:29  

00:00