You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Russia threatens to quit arms treaty
2007-02-16
Russia threatened on Thursday to pull out of a landmark nuclear arms control treaty unless the US backed away from plans to install its missile defence shield in Eastern Europe. Yury Baluyevsky, the Russian army chief of staff, said Moscow might unilaterally withdraw from the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces treaty, which forced the US and the Soviet Union to ban nuclear and conventional ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500km.

There was “convincing evidence” for leaving the agreement because “many countries are developing and perfecting medium-range rockets”, he said.
Like North Korea, Iran, Syria, Pakistan ...
But the general also explicitly linked RussiaÂ’s stance to the USÂ’s plans to extend its missile defence into central Europe. The Pentagon is preparing to start negotiations with Poland and the Czech Republic about hosting missile interceptors and radars. Jaroslaw Kaczynski, Polish prime minister, on Thursday expressed conditional support for participating in the system.

A senior Pentagon official said the US would “resist” the Russian move, which he said would have serious implications for American allies in Europe.

The INF treaty includes the right for a party to withdraw with six monthsÂ’ notice if “extraordinary events ... jeopardised its supreme interests”. The State Department said Russia had not formally notified the US of any move to abrogate the treaty.
Their withdrawal would also allow NATO to put IRBMs aimed at Russia into Poland, not that such a thing would happen.
Gen BaluyevskyÂ’s comments came days after Vladimir Putin, Russian president, warned that US attempts to deploy part of its missile shield in Poland could spark a new arms race. Mr Putin said the INF treaty was no longer in its interests because of proliferation of short and medium-range missiles. He rejected US assertions that the system was aimed at countries such as North Korea and Iran, not at Russia.

The US official said Russia had privately told the US it wanted medium-range missiles to counter Iranian threats while arguing publicly that the lack of Iranian missiles meant the US did not need a defence system.
Lack of Iranian missiles today. Wait til the Norks, or disaffected Russian scientists, or the Russians themselves, help the Iranians to a working IRBM system.
Col-Gen Leonid Ivashov, a former senior Russian defence official, said Moscow had “every reason” to pull out of the treaty. He pointed to the US withdrawal in 2002 from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty.

Yuri Solomonov, director of the Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology, which manufactures missiles, told Itar-Tass news agency Russia was ready to resume production of medium-range ballistic missiles. Nato officials said Russia intended to pressure Poland and the Czech Republic to reject US plans, but added that what Moscow really wanted was to be included in a European-wide anti-missile system. “We are already talking to the Russians about co-operating on tactical missile defence for armies in the field,” said a senior Nato diplomat.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Fact is the US pulled out of the anti-missile treaty because it was made with the Soviet Union, a Nation that no longer exists. So by default we acknowledge that the Russians are basically free of every treaty the Soviets signed.

The Russians know this, but don't want to admit it, because they really don't want the US to develop a working anti-missile defense because that hampers sales.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-02-16 16:46  

#8  (Russia) How dare you show that our missles can be shot down easily, it's hurting our business, you've gotta stop it AT ONCE, we're losing Rubles and "Face".(Rant, Rave, Squawk, Fuss, fume).
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-02-16 10:26  

#7  ..Cold War rantings at their best. This tells me that - Soviet Russian arms manufacturer propaganda aside - they really don't have anything that'll bring down an incoming missile, and if they did, they couldn't afford to deploy them. They're playing an double oldie but goodie here - knowing the fetish that the Left makes of treaties and International Law, Putie's counting on well-orchestrated 'public opinion' to stop us from going ahead with the deployment. This particular strategy has been tried twice before - first with the ERW (aka the neutron bomb) and the deployment of GLCMs and hyperaccurate Pershing IIs. It succeeded with the ERW (Carter, of course) and failed with the GLCM/Pershing deployment (Reagan/Thatcher, natch). How Bush will deal with it is a genuine unknown to me.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2007-02-16 09:45  

#6  YEA! We can make more nukes too!

Drinks all around!
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-02-16 08:46  

#5  Er I meant the INF treaty not SALT II
Posted by: Valentine   2007-02-16 08:08  

#4  They're pulling outta SALTII? Go ahead, that give us no compelling reason left to NOT follow through with 500+ km range ATACMs/MLRS missiles all the way up to modernized Pershing IIs and GLCM/Ground Launched TacToms with ranges in excess of 3000km. This is one of the more stupider moves the Russkies have pulled
Posted by: Valentine   2007-02-16 08:07  

#3  Maybe makes some overtures to Estonia. How about US missiles 100 miles from Leningrad St. Petersburg, Pooty-poot?
Posted by: Jackal   2007-02-16 06:39  

#2  Russia is an arms supplier to damn near every nation which is hostile to American interests and Bad Vlad recently made it very clear that they are committed to being a thorn in our side. Since they continue to act like our Cold War nemesis, we should continue to chip off former satellites, enhance NATO, and surround them with a defensive ring.
Posted by: Sic_Semper_Tyrannus   2007-02-16 06:31  

#1  "What goes around, Comes around!" I say; When pooty- poo wanted to goad up Syria, Iran, and the NORKs, he didn't have a problem with that. Now the 'chickens are coming home to roost! Let em back out, everyone can now have the right to arm to the teeth, we can all stroll holding hands straight to hell!! If they can afford it.
Posted by: smn   2007-02-16 01:49  

00:00