| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front Economy |
| Canadian, U.S. and Mexican officials held secretive meeting on integration |
| 2007-02-13 |
| Canadian, U.S. and Mexican politicians discussed using "stealth" to overcome public resistance to the integration of the three countries at a confidential meeting last year, according to documents just released under U.S. Freedom of Information laws. Top military brass, corporate executives and diplomats also attended the meeting in Banff, Alta., where participants discussed everything from the harmonization of food and drug standards, to common immigration policies, and the pooling of energy resources. The secret guest list of the North American Forum included then-U.S. secretary of defence Donald Rumsfeld, Canadian Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Rick Hillier, Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day, Pengrowth Corp. CEO James Kinnear and Lockheed Martin executive Ron Covais. Presentation outlines for the forum acknowledge that the concept of North American integration - which some call a "North American Union" - is unpopular, and note that it might be tough to sell as a concept. "While a vision is appealing, working on the infrastructure might yield more benefit and bring more people on board ('evolution by stealth')," the notes said. "Evolution by stealth" means using regulatory changes, such as food- and drug-safety benchmarks, which don't require parliamentary approval, to lay the infrastructure for North American integration. This allows for change with little or no public debate, critics say. Media were excluded from the September forum, and Day, who gave a speech at the event, declined to reveal the contents of his talk. "It was meant as a private meeting," said Melisa Leclerc, a spokeswoman from Day's office, although she conceded he attended "in his capacity as minister for public security." "It is not encouraging to see the phrase 'evolution by stealth' in reference to important policy debates such as North American integration," said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, a Washington-based conservative watchdog group that obtained the documents last week. But, former finance minister John Manley, who attended the meeting, said the forum was "not part of a nefarious plan to yield sovereignty to the U.S. .... It was just some informed private citizens and government officials having a conversation" on how best to co-operate to ensure their citizens enjoyed a safe and prosperous future. In fact, he said, Canada comes out stronger than ever from such meetings, which force "some senior American officials to think about Canada for a few days." However, Maude Barlow of the Council of Canadians said the reference to stealth is "a very telling and important statement." Many of the politicians who attended the forum have been pursuing "integration by stealth" for the past two years, she said, pointing to a little-known but top-priority agreement called the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The accord, kickstarted by U.S. President George W. Bush, then-prime minister Paul Martin and former Mexican president Vicente Fox at a 2005 meeting in Waco, Texas, is designed to streamline everything from food and drug safety standards to counter-terrorism measures. Government officials from the three countries are expected to meet in Ottawa later this month. However, Foreign Affairs spokespeople said they did not yet know when it would be held or who would attend. The partnership's stated goal is to protect North America from security threats such as terrorism and flu pandemics as well as economic threats from new global-market giants such as China. Many of the accord's measures are not contentious, such as plans to improve water quality, reduce sulphur in fuels, and co-ordinate efforts to fight pandemics and avian flu. But it also covers a host of hot-button issues such as plans to enhance data-sharing on high-risk travellers, revamp safety and environmental regulations, centralize the assessment of new chemicals and rework food safety standards. Most of the 300 policy recommendations within the accord may not require legislative changes, the Council of Canadians said. |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #8 There's already an integrated entity in North America. It the USA. If parts of Mexico or Canada want to integrate apply for statehood. And I wouldn't give great odds on Mexico. |
| Posted by: jds 2007-02-13 20:48 |
| #7 ONE LESSON of 9-11 > America adopts OWG and anti-US National-Global Socialism, or it will be destroyed, by any means necessary. Dubya's interpretation - America rules the world [in Amer Way] or Amer will be destroyed, ergo Amer chooses to rule the world. Within this scope, WOT > WAR FOR "KIND/TYPE" OF AMERICAN-STYLE OWG, i.e. GLOBAL FEDERALISM + GLOBAL DEMOCAPITALISM, vs anti-US, anti-democratic, Lefty GLOBAL CENTRALISM [Communism-Socialism]. When the DemoLefties rant agz alleged US-GOP "FASCISM", they are rantin' against not only RIGHTIST SOCIALISM, BUT ALSO RIGHTIST NATIONALISM = ULTRA-NATIONALISM, i.e. AGAINST AMERICANISM, AGAINST AMERICAN NATIONALISM, and against AMERICAN-CENTRIC UNIPOLARISM ANDOR MUTIPOLARISM + GLOBAL HEGEMONY, sub-i.e. against AMERICA BEING IN CHARGE OF ITS OWN ANDOR THE WORLD'S AFFAIRS, aka against Amer National-Global Sovereignty. against Amer NOT BEING "A LEADER" or "THE LEADER". Iff one believes that the WOT > also a WAR FOR OWG, then as per the Cold War many world nations know there are better off and free-er under an American-domin OWG than they will be under a Cold War-style, Commie Bloc-style OWG. IT IS MY BELIEF/CONVICTION THAT THE FUTURE OWG WILL BE, AND SHOULD BE, A FEDERALIST ONE - AMERS WANT $$$ AND BUSINESS, THEY AS A PEOPLE DON'T CARE ABOUT RULING EVERY COUNTRY ON EARTH. IFF OWG "MUST BE", DO AMERS WANT TO BE STRONG + SELF-RELIANT UNDER OWG, ANSWERABLE TO NO ONE EXCEPT OUR OWN; OR WEAK UNDER OWG, ANSWERABLE TO HIGHER AUTHORITY WHERE AMER IS JUST ONE MINOR/LESSOR STATE AGENDA AMONG MANY, WHERE NON-AMER =ANTI-AMER AUTHORITIES DECIDE WHAT IS BEST FOR MINOR AMERICA??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-02-13 20:12 |
| #6 Uhhh, EUSSR, anyone? |
| Posted by: anonymous2u 2007-02-13 19:21 |
| #5 This is another of the "secret plots to destroy the US". It ranks right up there with the Illuminati and Brandburger plots : rich and powerful people from several countries get together and discuss how to make their companies' lives easier, so they can make more money. Harmonizing regulations is actually called for in NAFTA, since it makes the cross-border trade easier and more efficient. This sort of paranoia is based on getting a few facts right and then spinning them out into some phantasm. Example, there really are black unmarked helicopters that fly in the US, they are part of Task Force 160 and and used to transport Special Forces in a deniable fashion : no markings, no way to track them. However, they are NOT evidence of a "shadow government that really runs the country", X-Files not withstanding. |
| Posted by: Shieldwolf 2007-02-13 18:42 |
| #4 Unifying certain regulations is a far cry from merging the three countries. A far cry. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-02-13 17:53 |
| #3 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060331.html |
| Posted by: J.D. Lux 2007-02-13 16:45 |
| #2 Maybe. They have toned it down . http://www.spp.gov/links.asp |
| Posted by: J.D. Lux 2007-02-13 16:42 |
| #1 I do not understand this nutty secret intergration biz. What is in it for any of the member countries which have long proud histories and very little to gain by such a loss of soveriegnty. This conspiracy just doesn't pass the most basic smell test. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-02-13 15:43 |