You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
NY Times criticizes other news organizations for reporting fake story
2007-01-30
Mr. KuhnerÂ’s Web site, Insight, the last remnant of a defunct conservative print magazine owned by the Unification Church led by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon, was able to set off a wave of television commentary, talk-radio chatter, official denials, investigations by journalists around the globe and news media self-analysis that has lasted 11 days and counting.

The controversy started with a quickly discredited Jan. 17 article on the Insight Web site asserting that the presidential campaign of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was preparing an accusation that her rival, Senator Barack Obama, had covered up a brief period he had spent in an Islamic religious school in Indonesia when he was 6.
As opposed to a similar scandal that was denied for weeks, by this very newspaper.
Mr. Kuhner’s ability to ignite a news media brush fire nonetheless illustrates how easily dubious and politically charged information can spread through the constant chatter of cable news commentary, talk radio programs and political Web sites but not newspapers, especially one as prestigious as us. And at the start of a campaign with perhaps a dozen candidates hiring “research directors” to examine one another, the Insight episode may be a sign of what is to come.
Let us all savor the rich, rich irony of the Gray Lady that is the New York Times blasting weblogs for reporting fake stories.
Posted by:gromky

#6  The staff of the NYT can all line up single file and lick the backside of my balls. Except for Dowd, she can lick the business end of an old baseball bat.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-30 22:24  

#5  Oh, but they apologized for (one of) their fake stories, so it's OK to blast everyone else.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-01-30 10:41  

#4  Easy there RD, the Times looks a little rich for your taste glands.
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-30 04:03  

#3  Best savor this irony in small bits - it's too rich for most metabolisms, I think.

ima choking, nyt is f&cking foul.
Posted by: RD   2007-01-30 02:20  

#2  Tell me about it.
Posted by: Richard Jewell   2007-01-30 02:02  

#1  Good catch, gromky. Best savor this irony in small bits - it's too rich for most metabolisms, I think.
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-01-30 01:54  

00:00