You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Anti-war protesters spray paint Capitol building
2007-01-30
Anti-war protesters were allowed to spray paint on part of the west front steps of the United States Capitol building after police were ordered to break their security line by their leadership, two sources told The Hill.

According to the sources, police officers were livid when they were told to fall back by U.S. Capitol Police (USCP) Chief Phillip Morse andDeputy Chief Daniel Nichols. "They were the commanders on the scene," one source said, who requested anonymity. "It was disgusting." After police ceded the stairs, located on the lower west front of the Capitol, the building was locked down, the source added.

A second source who witnessed the incident said that the police had the crowd stopped at Third Street, but were told to bring the police line in front of the Capitol. Approximately 300 protesters were allowed to take the steps and began to spray paint "anarchist symbols" and phrase such as "Our capitol building" and "you canÂ’t stop us" around the area, the source said.

Morse responded to these claims in an e-mail Sunday afternoon explaining that the protesters were seeking confrontation with the police. "While there were minor instances of spray painting of pavement by a splinter group of Anarchists who were seeking a confrontation with the police, their attempts to breach into secure areas and rush the doors of the Capitol were thwarted," Morse said. "The graffiti was easily removed by the dedicated [Architect of the Capitol] staff, some of whom responded on their day off to quickly clean the area."

He added, "It is the USCP's duty and responsibility to protect the Capitol complex, staff and public while allowing the public to exercise their First Amendment rights Â… at the end of the day, both occurred without injury to protestors or officers."

Yet, the sources who talked to The Hill were furious that protesters were not stopped before reaching the Capitol. "To get that close to the Capitol building, that is ridiculous," the second source said. "[Police] were told not to arrest anyone." The second source added that police had to stand by and watch as protesters posed in front of their graffiti.
Posted by:Deacon Blues

#13  "..explaining that the protesters were seeking confrontation with the police"
Hell I'm an old lady, but would love to hold back these jerks. I have a few tricks up my sleeve.
They want a confrontation? Yeah, bring it on.
Posted by: Jan   2007-01-30 17:05  

#12  to allow these jokers their rights in what amounted to scrawl graffiti, also have that close of access to potentially cause real harm is ridiculous. What about MY rights here.

I believe in these rights, but not at the expense of others.
They should have been arrested and made to pay (not taxpayers money here) for the damages they caused and thrown in jail for these antics.
To allow them to sling their shit on me (and they do so by attacking our public buildings).
What entire bullshit (*and yes, bullshit pronounced with real emphasis here).
I agree with Cyber Sarge.
Posted by: Jan   2007-01-30 16:56  

#11  They should have called in a Marine.
With a flamethrower. It's time to quit accepting treason as "free speach" and start shooting some of these idiots. Until we do, they will get bolder and bolder, and do even more damage to our Constitution. "Free Speach" is not a license: it comes with a set of responsibilities that need to be met. Freedom without responsibility is anarchy, and should be responded to as such.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-01-30 15:21  

#10  Excellent point, Procopius2k. You need Guiliani in there to use some more of that "broken windows" thinking.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-30 12:36  

#9  Prolly wasn't spray paint. Ewwww...too many evil toxic chemicals and all. Most likely enviromentally safe blood left over from the Anti-fur rally earlier in the week.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2007-01-30 12:26  

#8  I want to go to DC and put my message on the Capitol steps. If the Capitol Police do not allow it, I will sue them for violating my First Amendment rights. After all, if antiwar types are allowed to write messages, I should be able to do so too.
Posted by: Rambler   2007-01-30 11:24  

#7  I canÂ’t for the life of me understand why the Capital Police let them through their lines. If they are not there to protect the Capital from this very kind of crime why be there at all? I mean on the extreme if the Capital Police had gone medieval, cracked a few skulls, who would have faulted them? If they acquiesce this quickly in front of these losers how affective would they be against a real threat? The supervisors who ordered the retreat should be fired and the leaders of the anarchists should be arrested and made to pay damages and restitution. The next time (oh and now they will be emboldened) they should crack a few noggins and see how many brave Mo0b@+5 want to fly across the police line.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2007-01-30 10:38  

#6  They should have called in a Marine.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-01-30 09:36  

#5  The collective voices of the carping lemmings are heard. There was Hanoi Jane and Bhaghdad Sean Penn, Susan Dead Man Walking Sarandon, etc. There is no moral high ground in that crowd contrary to what they think. They are only legends in their own minds.
Posted by: Hupeash Flung4618   2007-01-30 09:17  

#4  Morse responded to these claims in an e-mail Sunday afternoon explaining that the protesters were seeking confrontation with the police.

So why didn't you give them one? It appears your rank and file wouldn't have had a problem with it.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-30 09:12  

#3  Notice how most graffiti is tagged on abandoned and run down buildings and outlays which reflect the state of those who occupy it. So considering the ‘qualityÂ’ that inhabits the building, this is sort of appropriate. Maybe when we move the transients out of the old flop house and get new occupants interested in gentrifying the place, the taggers will move on. Until it has some real value, I wouldnÂ’t worry about it too much. If the current occupants aren't worried about our real security, why should I be upset about theirs?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-01-30 08:48  

#2  Are these fuckups related to the Park Police?
Posted by: Shipman   2007-01-30 04:05  

#1  Because they love America almost as much as they love the troops.
Posted by: ed   2007-01-30 02:25  

00:00