Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front Economy | |
Bush oil reserve plan sparks price surge | |
2007-01-25 | |
![]()
The speech marked Mr Bush’s strongest effort yet to slow the growth of greenhouse gases with a plan to cut US demand for petrol by 20 per cent over the next 10 years by raising fuel-economy standards and setting targets for a shift to alternative fuels. “The plan will confront climate change by stopping the projected growth of carbon dioxide emissions from cars, light trucks and SUVs within 10 years,” a White House document said. In an echo of last year’s speech, when the president memorably warned that America was “addicted to oil”, Mr Bush said: “For too long, our nation has been dependent on foreign oil. And this dependence leaves us more vulnerable to hostile regimes, and to terrorists – who could cause huge disruptions of oil shipments.” Mr Bush defended his strategy. “Many in this chamber understand that America must not fail in Iraq – because you understand that the consequences of failure would be grievous and far-reaching.” | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#7 #2: Now now, we mustn't anger the people who are perpetually angry at us. They might get angry. Why not give them Real Greviances So They Can stew even harder, Then They"ll pop their Cork And vanish from the face of the earth quicker. SOUNDS wIN-win to me |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2007-01-25 10:39 |
#6 right now would be a good time for the price of oil and nat gas to drop like a rock, to put big-time pressure on Iran's economy, cash flow. The Saooodis are doing that by temporarily bumping up production. Expect to see the price continue to fall after this very-temporary hike |
Posted by: Frank G 2007-01-25 07:27 |
#5 Bush triggered it and it is a damn good thing he did. The only way "alternative" fuels will be able to make it to market is if the price of oil is kept high. I prefer an oil import fee, but if he prefers to go with building up the strategic reserve, that's OK, too. Better to have the oil in CONUS salt mines than Arab sand dunes. |
Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2007-01-25 06:42 |
#4 Why not, as private property owners can't have TOO MANY things on their own property; + employment and job rates, etc. can't be TOO HIGH. D *** ng it, SOMEONE(S) HAS TO PC/PDENIABLY KILL OFF 3.0 BILYUHN to 90%-plus of earth's population, POLITELY BUT LAWFULLY NECESSARILY WID NO JAIL TIME OR EXECUTION FOR GLOBAL GENOCIDE. HECK, WHY WAIT FOR YEAR 2029 WHEN PRAVDA SAYS AMERIKANS CAN DESTROY THE MOON NOW IN THE NAME OF HE-3? Hear that, SUN, your solar ass is ours once we destroy 1.5Milyuhn-plus Moons = 999,999-plus Earths just becuz we can - SURRENDER NOW TO NUREMBURG OR FACE OUR WRATH IN 1.0 Milyuhn Years. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-01-25 01:34 |
#3 Now now, we mustn't anger the people who are perpetually angry at us. They might get angry. lol outrage piled upon outrage, plz blow a fuse! |
Posted by: RD 2007-01-25 01:11 |
#2 Now now, we mustn't anger the people who are perpetually angry at us. They might get angry. |
Posted by: Steve White 2007-01-25 00:46 |
#1 Are these anonymous critics saying the US should not increase the size of its strategic oil reserve? |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-01-25 00:38 |