You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Navy Tests High-Tech Railgun in Virginia
2007-01-19
DAHLGREN, Va. — Normally, new weaponry tends to make defense more expensive. But the Navy likes to say its new railgun delivers the punch of a missile at bullet prices. A flashy demonstration of the futuristic and comparatively inexpensive railgun weapon Tuesday at the Naval Surface Warfare Center had Navy brass smiling. The weapon, which was successfully tested in October at the King George County base, fires nonexplosive projectiles at incredible speeds, using electricity rather than gun powder.

The technology could increase the striking range of U.S. Navy ships more than tenfold by the year 2020. "It's pretty amazing capability, and it went off without a hitch," said Capt. Joseph McGettigan, commander of NSWC Dahlgren Division. "The biggest thing is it's real not just something on the drawing board," he said. "It could go to the field right now. We just want to improve it, to make it better."

The railgun works by sending electric current along parallel rails, creating an electromagnetic force so powerful it can fire a metal projectile at tremendous speed. Because the gun uses electricity and not gunpowder to fire projectiles, it's safer, eliminating the possibility of explosions on ships and vehicles equipped with it. Instead, a powerful pulse generator is used.

The prototype fired at Dahlgren is only an 8-megajoule electromagnetic device, but the one to be used on Navy ships will generate a massive 64 megajoules. Current Navy guns generate about 9 megajoules of muzzle energy. The railgun's 200 to 250 nautical-mile range will allow Navy ships to strike deep in enemy territory while staying out of reach of hostile forces.

Rear Adm. William E. "Bill" Landay, chief of Naval Research, said Navy railgun progress from the drawing board to reality has been rapid. "A year ago, this was (just) a good idea we all wanted to pursue," he said.

Elizabeth D'Andrea of the Office of Naval Research said a 32-megajoule lab gun will be delivered to Dahlgren in June.

The projectile fired Tuesday weighed only 3.2 kilograms and had no warhead. Future railgun ordnance won't be large and heavy, either, but will deliver the punch of a Tomahawk cruise missile because of the immense speed of the projectile at impact. Garnett compared that force to hitting a target with a Ford Taurus at 380 mph. "It will take out a building," he said. Warheads aren't needed because of the massive force of impact.
Posted by:Fred

#20  Be sure to thank God, or at least Madonna + SIblings, for dev Coconuts + Tropical Islands. The next time PAULA "DELILAH/BATHSHEBA" ABDUL kicks a tropical plant, have her arrested.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-01-19 22:15  

#19  Multi-capable Arsenal Ships + Aircraft Carriers maried to CATAMARAN HULLS + GMD/SPAWAR [FLOATING BATTLE STATIONS/SEA FORTS]. Multi surface warfare designs in one.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-01-19 22:13  

#18  Now that they have unveiled this maybe the Navy ought to think about restoring Bussard's fusion research budget and if the DOE complains tell 'em to go piss up a rope


http://www.askmar.com/ConferenceNotes/2006-9%20IAC%20Paper.pdf


video of his talk at Google last year


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1996321846673788606

Be warned it is about 1-1/2 hours long
Posted by: Cheddarhead   2007-01-19 20:10  

#17  North Dakota has a lot of old missile launch sites not being used at the moment.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-19 18:50  

#16  Now we need a land based platform to launch "Rods From God" type weapons ballistically from a comfortable place.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2007-01-19 18:00  

#15  USN WIfe used to work @ Dahlgren: whenever they tested Battleship guns ( had a bunch of 16 " barrels laying around) they had to clear the river downstream and depending on the weather, herd the staff that was nearby into little noise shelters, that looked like thick concrete bus stops. I got to go over and play with some really neat airplane related spooky stuff, and the station looks like an 'A'Team playground.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-01-19 15:11  

#14  Yeh , nice of us Brits to help out in the beginning too :)

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2003/05/mil-030512-navsea04.htm
Posted by: MacNails   2007-01-19 13:49  

#13  Nice to see our military put the Quake weaponry to good use.

about time.
Posted by: danking_70   2007-01-19 13:39  

#12  The "rods from God" weapon system has been criticized for the high cost of putting such weapons into orbit. Rail guns drastically cut the price, and could conceivably make it possible to bombard the other side of the world using suborbital and orbital projectiles at a much lower cost. Maybe rail guns on naval vessels aren't the only possible application.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-19 13:19  

#11  Feasible for a ship from an energy stanpoint. An Aegis destroyer's engines generates 100MW shaft power, say 90MW for a generator if electric drive, or enough power to sustain 1 shot per second at 60MJ per shot plus rapid fire ability from reserve power stored in ultracapacitors.

For a tank, maybe. The best tank cannons generate near 20MJ kinetic energy.
If the claims of ultracapacitor startup EEStor are true (not yet verified ), a 52kWH (187 MegaJoules) ultracap storage pack weighs 400 pounds. 5 or 6 such packs may be enough for 40 shots assuming the ultracaps can discharge enough energy in miliseconds. A 1500 shaft horsepower turbine on an M1 tank can generate 1.0 MW electricy, enough to sustain only 2 shots/minute after the stored energy is drained. Add to that the need for a generator, hybrid or electric drive, ultracap and electronics storage volume balanced against the elimination of the loader crewman, small ammo volume, possibly even higher rate of fire and ability to tailor muzzle velocity to the target.

BTW, a 52kWH ultracap can power an electric car for 200 miles.
Posted by: ed   2007-01-19 13:16  

#10  For nuke powered ships, a row of gauss cannon should be easily powered.

The question is how feasable having a generator+capacitors makes this viable for a tank, since you can use lighter rounds and not have to worry as much about brewing up.
Posted by: Trub   2007-01-19 12:17  

#9  er...

1.21 jigawatts
Posted by: Anon4021   2007-01-19 11:53  

#8  Assuming of course you can generate enough electricity to drive a rapid fire operation, then sure.

1.21 GIGAWATTS!!!
Posted by: Anon4021   2007-01-19 11:45  

#7  Now to put that auto feeder on it.
By the way, I believe there is no recoil with such a propulsion system, and rapid fire is definitely within normal operation.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-01-19 11:29  

#6  "Fire the wave-motion gun!"
Posted by: Pappy   2007-01-19 09:44  

#5  When they first started messing with this stuff in the 70s, I read that they could accelerate a [forgotten figure, on the order of an ounce] pellet to escape velocity.

Imagine taking out a tank - and part of the real estate behind it - with a .45 round.
Posted by: Fred   2007-01-19 09:16  

#4  If folks worry about the magnetic fields around power lines and cell phones, what are they going to say about 32 megajoule pulses? And it had better not screw up my tv signal.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-01-19 07:49  

#3  http://www.exn.ca/video/?video=exn20040407-plasmaboy.asx
Posted by: Skidmark   2007-01-19 07:16  

#2  We (industrialized nations) have a lot of staff. Now, all we need, is the will to use it on the barbs.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-19 06:46  

#1  At least somebody found a use for a Taurus.
Posted by: Mike N.   2007-01-19 00:38  

00:00