You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Sumocraft A380 costs are ballooning
2007-01-19
PARIS - The two-year delay to the Airbus A380 is proving costlier than expected, parent company EADS said Wednesday in a profit warning that sent shares lower as the aircraft maker confirmed it had lost its five-year lead in orders to Boeing. Airbus won orders for 824 airliners last year, the company said -- well short of both Boeing's 1,050 tally and its own industry record of 1,111 in 2005 -- but delivered 434 planes to its U.S.-based rival's 398.

Despite the production crisis blighting the double-decker A380, 2006 was ''the best year ever in terms of deliveries and the second best year in terms of sales,'' said EADS co-Chief Executive Louis Gallois, who also heads Airbus.
Both of which are crumping: the orders now, and deliveries in the next year or two as the slump in orders catches up.
Shortly before the orders announcement, EADS said an unspecified fourth-quarter accounting charge tipped Airbus into an operating loss for 2006 that will ''roughly balance'' earnings before interest and tax from other divisions. Hans Peter Ring, chief financial officer for both EADS and Airbus, said the ''bulk of the charges'' were previously disclosed but had now been brought forward -- including costs linked to the A380 setbacks and restructuring plans. ''We're accepting a bigger hit in 2006 to prepare a better future,'' Ring said, declining to provide any breakdown of the losses. The A380 problems would wipe 4.8 billion ($6.2 billion) from 2006-2010 profit, EADS said last October.
That's a lot of money to suck out of the pockets of Euro taxpayers.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  It's even possible that Airbus will lose money on every A380 that has been ordered to date.

But they'll make it up on volume.

/schadenfreude
Posted by: xbalanke   2007-01-19 16:31  

#5  DoDo: that is a pretty fair assumption. Airbust was counting on huge freighter orders to subsidize the pax version, but now all freighter orders except UPS have melted away. And freighters didn't need the expensive in-flight entertainment wiring systems that the pax versions do. I think there are deeper problems that haven't been made public yet, but will be brought out in about a year, as an excuse for more 'schedule slide.'
Note to the USAF Tanker program: Don't bet on these guys producing anything on time.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2007-01-19 15:06  

#4  The interesting thing about the wiring issue, if that's really the problem, is that it would seem that each plane will also be much more costly to produce than expected. It would follow that it has been underpriced, and that gross margins will be less than expected. It's even possible that Airbus will lose money on every A380 that has been ordered to date.

Airbus is probably considering how much to increase the price of the aircraft and how much they can get from European governments to cover the additional costs to keep the factories running.
Posted by: DoDo   2007-01-19 13:09  

#3  Steve: That's a lot of money to suck out of the pockets of Euro taxpayers.

That should be "There's still a ton of money to be sucked out of the pockets of Euro taxpayers."

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2007-01-19 11:02  

#2  'Swirling the drain'

crumping :-) thx Doc
Posted by: RD   2007-01-19 08:48  

#1  
"Sumocraft" ..LOL Dr. Steve!
perhaps we'll have to hunt up a Huge Wra'ssler wearing turkey feathers.
Posted by: RD   2007-01-19 08:35  

00:00