You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Massachusetts Jury Awards 400k to profiled passenger
2007-01-16
Jan 16-FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. -- A jury in Massachusetts ruled on Friday that American Airlines should pay a South Florida man $400,000 in a discrimination case. John Cerqueira and his attorneys accused American Airlines of racial profiling after he was removed from a plane in Boston in December 2003. Cerqueira said he had visited family in the Boston area and was trying to fly back to Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport when American Airlines officials ordered him and two other men off the plane.

"I have a feeling these kinds of incidents of racial profiling happen to people more often than we're aware of," said Cerqueira.

Cerqueira said three Massachusetts state police officers escorted him and two Israeli men off of the plane. They were all questioned and later released.
American Airline tried to defend itself by saying the profiling was behaviour based but the Jury chose to disregard the AAirline testimony. This will give aid and comfort to the supporters of jihad friendly 'anti profiling' legislation.
Posted by:mhw

#14  "The Massachusetts elecorate has learned nothing."

Yes. And this is what happens when a false "morality" replaces the real thing. False morality always focuses on thought patterns which set up a sense of superority among those who hold to them. True morality promotes humility, common sense, and a willingness to take action which is actually in the long-term best interest of one's fellow man--i.e., we don't want to "discriminate" so we provide HUGE monetary awards for an honest mistake by an airline that was trying its best to act in the public's interest. We "feel better" momentarily, but the end result is the emboldenment of the facsist, violent, Mohammendans.

In other words, truth gives way to stupidity once again.

Posted by: ex-lib   2007-01-16 23:32  

#13  from National Commission on Terrorist Attacks
Boston: American 11 and United 175. Atta and Omari boarded a 6:00 A.M. flight from Portland to Boston's Logan International Airport.1

When he checked in for his flight to Boston, Atta was selected by a computerized prescreening system known as CAPPS (Computer Assisted Passenger Prescreening System), created to identify passengers who should be subject to special security measures. Under security rules in place at the time, the only consequence of Atta's selection by CAPPS was that his checked bags were held off the plane until it was confirmed that he had boarded the aircraft. This did not hinder Atta's plans. 2

Atta and Omari arrived in Boston at 6:45. Seven minutes later, Atta apparently took a call from Marwan al Shehhi, a longtime colleague who was at another terminal at Logan Airport. They spoke for three minutes.3 It would be their final conversation.

Between 6:45 and 7:40, Atta and Omari, along with Satam al Suqami, Wail al Shehri, and Waleed al Shehri, checked in and boarded American Airlines Flight 11, bound for Los Angeles. The flight was scheduled to depart at 7:45.4

In another Logan terminal, Shehhi, joined by Fayez Banihammad, Mohand al Shehri, Ahmed al Ghamdi, and Hamza al Ghamdi, checked in for United Airlines Flight 175, also bound for Los Angeles. A couple of Shehhi's colleagues were obviously unused to travel; according to the United ticket agent, they had trouble understanding the standard security questions, and she had to go over them slowly until they gave the routine, reassuring answers.5 Their flight was scheduled to depart at 8:00.

The security checkpoints through which passengers, including Atta and his colleagues, gained access to the American 11 gate were operated by Globe Security under a contract with American Airlines. In a different terminal, the single checkpoint through which passengers for United 175 passed was controlled by United Airlines, which had contracted with Huntleigh USA to perform the screening.6

In passing through these checkpoints, each of the hijackers would have been screened by a walk-through metal detector calibrated to detect items with at least the metal content of a .22-caliber handgun. Anyone who might have set off that detector would have been screened with a hand wand-a procedure requiring the screener to identify the metal item or items that caused the alarm. In addition, an X-ray machine would have screened the hijackers' carry-on belongings. The screening was in place to identify and confiscate weapons and other items prohibited from being carried onto a commercial flight.7 None of the checkpoint supervisors recalled the hijackers or reported anything suspicious regarding their screening.8

While Atta had been selected by CAPPS in Portland, three members of his hijacking team-Suqami, Wail al Shehri, and Waleed al Shehri-were selected in Boston. Their selection affected only the handling of their checked bags, not their screening at the checkpoint. All five men cleared the checkpoint and made their way to the gate for American 11. Atta, Omari, and Suqami took their seats in business class (seats 8D, 8G, and 10B, respectively). The Shehri brothers had adjacent seats in row 2 (Wail in 2A,Waleed in 2B), in the first-class cabin. They boarded American 11 between 7:31 and 7:40. The aircraft pushed back from the gate at 7:40. 9

Shehhi and his team, none of whom had been selected by CAPPS, boarded United 175 between 7:23 and 7:28 (Banihammad in 2A, Shehri in 2B, Shehhi in 6C, Hamza al Ghamdi in 9C, and Ahmed al Ghamdi in 9D).Their aircraft pushed back from the gate just before 8:00.10

The Massachusetts electorate has learned nothing. Major airlines should discontinue all operations from Logan Airport. Passengers should boycott it.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-01-16 22:30  

#12  But in other news:
According to today's Seattle Times, the 9th Circuit Court in SF overturned one of Ammed Ressam's convictions. Sent it back to the lower court for a 'do-over.' Remember he was the 'Millenium Bomber' that was caught trying to enter Washington State with a car load of explosives, heading for LAX. I was unsuccessful in getting the link, but it is via the AP.
Posted by: USN, ret.   2007-01-16 22:25  

#11  Think the airlines should just quit serving Massachusetts. Let the terrorists drive, take trains, or ships. If Massachusetts is going to let lawyers decide who is safe, then that is their problem and should not be inflicted on the rest of us.
Posted by: RWV   2007-01-16 21:00  

#10  This is unbelieveable stupidity. But, then again, Kennedy and Kerry continue to be reelected. What kind of numbnuts reside in Massachusetts ? Do you assholes realize what you've done ? I hope AA has the sense to appeal this, all the way to Supreme Court, if necessary. This kind of shit must be stopped dead in its tracks.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2007-01-16 20:25  

#9  No worries, it's not like terrorists have ever used airports in Massachusetts ... oh, wait ...
Posted by: DMFD   2007-01-16 18:56  

#8  The award should be knocked down on appeal. Of course it IS The People's Republic of Taxachussetts.
Posted by: doc   2007-01-16 18:25  

#7  Again a perfect example of why lawyers are a threat to our society. Screw the legal profession and thank them for the increase in air fares and the decrease in your safety while flying.

Profiling works that is why liberals, lawyers and, terrorists don't approve of it.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2007-01-16 16:45  

#6  Next time I fly, I'll be wearing a dishdash and praising Allan. It's like playing the Lotto!
Posted by: JDB   2007-01-16 16:41  

#5  What sort of behavior did he exhibit?

I doubt it was anything like the flying Imams.
Posted by: danking_70   2007-01-16 15:25  

#4  The "soft jihad" continues unabated.

This does not bode well. Expect more lawsuits from those claiming to have been racially / religiously profiled.

We're losing the war on jihad here at home.
Posted by: Mark Z   2007-01-16 15:18  

#3  There's a difference?
Posted by: Raj   2007-01-16 14:05  

#2  This is insanity.

No.
It's Massachusetts.
Posted by: tu3031   2007-01-16 13:57  

#1  This is insanity. If the airline was up to shenanigans we could always fly another carrier. But how do you boycott a moronic jury?
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-01-16 13:54  

00:00