| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Fineman: Iraq Realigns American Politics |
| 2007-01-14 |
| Fineman gets out his kneepads for Teddy Ted Kennedy speaks with the voice of Mmmmmm. Healthy bourbon. No one tells Ted Kennedy what to do; in any case, the Senate's Democratic leaders were fine with his plan to give a big speech two days before President George W. Bush announced a troop "surge" in Iraq. They are generally glad to let Kennedy play the role he relishes: Irish-American Isaiah, calling his party to account even as legislative insiders keep their distance. Meaning: the other dhimms are scared, but Teddy knows the Peoples Republic of MA will keep on sending him back, no matter what. This time party brass got more than they bargained for. Summoning the authority of his years as an And I know! My brother instigated our Vietnam adventure! Hiccup. It was, in its own way, a defining moment. He got a standing ovation and, the next day, congratulations all around on the Hill. By the end of the week—in the aftermath of Bush's tepid speech and Condi Rice's evasive testimony—Kennedy looked prescient. Prescient? Oh, my hero, always in the lead! A generation ago, a war So.......Reagan was right, correct? Now a mirror image is developing. Democrats seem to be uniting around a theme—the primacy of global diplomacy and congressional review. Republicans, by contrast, have lost the unity that they had during the cold war and the early years of the war on terror. Ya, diplomacy and congressional oversight. That will fix it. As Republican divisions grow, Democrats, pressed by their antiwar grass roots, are drawing together. Except for "Independent Democrat" Sen. Joe Lieberman, Dems are increasingly of one mind about Iraq in particular and antiterrorism strategy in general. A vote on surge spending—which Democratic Senate leaders had hoped to avoid and which is technically difficult to devise—now is likely at some point. In general, the party seems less fearful of the old "soft on defense" shibboleth, and ever more tolerant of groups such as Win Without War and Move On. One of the Senate's few other hawkish Democrats, Sen. Evan Bayh, told me that he opposes the surge, and agreed that Congress might have to face the question of funding at some point. The Senate's growing ranks of Democratic presidential contenders—Chris Dodd jumped in last week, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are expected to do so soon—are gravitating toward a bring-them-home-quickly stance. "We don't want to come off looking like wimps," said Terry McAuliffe, a Clinton supporter and former party chairman. But he added: "We're jumping all over ourselves now to see who can be the toughest on Bush and the war." It's a fateful competition—which Ted Kennedy already won. Teddy, the lead lemming. Good luck with that. |
| Posted by:Brett |
| #3 At of yestiddy, the RINO CINO Left were still putting out GOP-Conservative looking,toned-down, professional andor well-dressed, cosmetics-heavy, ex-CheerLeader/Model, Motherly Caring Educated demure "Your Mom wants Her for Daughter-in-Law + Bear Her Grandchildren" attractive Babeperts to offset the opposing GOP-Right Babeperts across the TV screens. JEANNE GARAFOLOS AND ASSORTED BRA-BURNING DEDICATED HIPPIE CHICKS, ...........etc. NEED NOT APPLY. * NEWSMAX > MORRIS & MCGANN > Inter-Lefty, Inter-Democrat CIVIL WAR looming between Clinton-style PC "Centrists" + "Moderates" vs. ANTI-CLINTON/CENTRIST "NEW LEFT" Democrats, i.e. those Dems = DemoLefties to the [Far/Radical???] LEFT OF AL GORE + JOHN KERRY??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-01-14 23:53 |
| #2 Source for comment 1 |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-01-14 18:55 |
#1 I am tending more and more to agree with the following opinion from a poster on The Belmont Club:I think the Iranians have tested the political resolve of the American people and have found out what they knew to be the case all along: we are not united as a people and are not willing to fight this to a successful conclusion. The problem has not been political leadership, vascilating as it has been at times. The American people have put 9/11 behind them, and all the other manifestations of Islamic jihad against us since 1979 behind them. They want to return to the world as it was the way they perceived it before 9/11. They don't want to face this and will only face it at such time as the enemy exacts a terrible toll against us. There is no way to make the nation move energetically if it is enervated. As far as most Americans are concerned, Islamic terror is a criminal matter, not a manifestation of war. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2007-01-14 18:53 |