Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Judge Dismisses Anthrax Libel Case |
2007-01-13 |
![]() U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton in Alexandria dismissed the case a week after lawyers for the Times argued that Steven Hatfill should be considered a public figure under libel law, which makes it much more difficult for a public figure to win a judgment than a private citizen. The judge did not explain his ruling in the order issued Friday. Hatfill's lawyers had argued that even if Hatfill qualified as a public figure, they could still prevail at trial because they had uncovered serious flaws in the reporting of columnist Nicholas Kristof. |
Posted by:Steve White |
#5 So, essentially, the press can libel anyone they want, because in doing so they turn them into a public figure. We *seriously* need to reign-in the combined forces of the press and lawyers. This is getting obscene. |
Posted by: Rob Crawford 2007-01-13 12:00 |
#4 "public figure" rationale proves that the 'equal before the law' context of the 14th Amendment is just pap for judges to exercise power. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-01-13 09:18 |
#3 NYT is skating close to the orphans murder defesne. He's a public figure so we're immune. course we made him a public figure |
Posted by: Shipman 2007-01-13 09:08 |
#2 An appeal seems very ... well ... appealing. |
Posted by: doc 2007-01-13 08:50 |
#1 because Stephen Hatfill was such a widely known person before the FBI and the NYT collaborated to make him the face of American anthrax attacks? Bullshit. He should appeal this ninny's ruling |
Posted by: Frank G 2007-01-13 08:10 |