You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front Economy
Bush lifts ban on oil drilling in Alaska fishery
2007-01-10
President Bush on Tuesday lifted the drilling ban for AlaskaÂ’s Bristol Bay, clearing the way for the Interior Department to open the fish-rich waters to oil and natural gas development. Alaska officials as well as some local communities had asked for the ban to be lifted, but environmentalists and some fishermen have warned against drilling in the bay, which is the gateway for the largest wild salmon runs in the world as well as a major source for crab and cod. "Bristol Bay is one the most important fisheries in America and in the world," Sierra Club director Carl Pope said in a statement. "It's incredibly reckless to risk such an outstanding natural resource just to satisfy Big Oil."

Three local governments said they felt the ban should be lifted so that the bay could be tested for oil deposits, adding that they would back drilling only if they felt it was environmentally sound. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne said one or two lease sales in about 5.6 million acres of Bristol Bay will be considered for leasing in the departmentÂ’s upcoming five-year 2007-2012 lease plan.

Separately, Bush lifted a drilling moratorium in an area of the central Gulf of Mexico known as Lease Area 181, making that area available to drilling. The Gulf waters acted upon by the president is a small part of a much larger 8.2 million acres that were approved for oil and gas development by Congress last month in one of its last acts before adjournment.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Maybe it's just my paranoia, but I think we're in the middle of a Cold OIL war and it may turn HOT very soon.

Especially with the idea that Iran may *try* to control the Straits in the gulf militarily, this seems like an insurance policy against another war in the Mideast soon.

:|
Posted by: Anon4021   2007-01-10 13:21  

#8  I've actually read studies where fish LOVE the offshore platforms. There long enough, they develop their own coral systems (if planted) and the fish can hide from predators there. Of course, on a commercial fishing scale, I doubt it'll make much difference. But, let's just let the enviros nit-pick their way to funding jihadi terror, why don't we?
Posted by: BA   2007-01-10 10:41  

#7  of course all of us think know for certain that this is a win win and better late than never. Hell the tecnology is orders of magnitude better including saftey. Inspite of all that if there is a spill then new clean up tec and fines mitigate them.
Posted by: RD   2007-01-10 07:27  

#6  "It's incredibly reckless to risk such an outstanding natural resource just to satisfy Big Oil."

Yes, but it helps the other 300 million of us by helping to keep prices down, reduce the need for foreign wars and help get the troops out of the middle east, and will reduce funding to terrorists and other petro-crazies. At that rate, it's a bargain.
Posted by: Bobby   2007-01-10 07:05  

#5  Now all we need is to do the same off southern California and on George's Bank off New England and we'll have access to enough oil to at least partially tell the ME to go to hell.
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-01-10 06:16  

#4  Getting the petrodollars out of the hands of terrorists states! Hope it's not too late.
Posted by: gorb   2007-01-10 04:30  

#3  The real war on terror.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-01-10 01:54  

#2  HOOORAY!
Posted by: newc   2007-01-10 01:53  

#1  It's big news in AK. Has the support of most of the commercial fisherman and local tribal councils along Bristol Bay.
Posted by: anymouse   2007-01-10 01:04  

00:00