You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
'US at war with Jihadi Islam'
2007-01-05
Sounds like Rantburg commentary to me...
“Our enemies have declared war on us, and their hatred cannot be sated. We will either defeat them, or they will come after us with the unsheathed sword,” says the White House.

In a long, rambling essay, startling for some of its neoconservative jargon, Peter Wehner of the White House Office of Strategic Initiatives, declares that the war against global jihadism will be long, with success and setbacks along the way, but the West must not grow impatient, nor withdraw from the fight. The enemy is “not Islam per se” but a global network of extremists driven by a twisted vision of Islam. “These jihadists are certainly a minority within Islam - but they exist, they are dangerous and resolute, in some places they are ascendant, and they need to be confronted and defeated,” he writes.

According to Wehner, Al Qaeda and its terrorist allies are waging their war on several continents and will try to overthrow governments and seize power where they can. Where they cannot, they will attempt to inflict fear and destruction by disrupting settled ways of life. They will employ every weapon they can: assassinations, car bombs, airplanes, and, if they can secure them, biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons, he warns. He maintains that Iran is controlled by Shia extremists and today Iran is “the most active state sponsor of terrorism in the world”.

He writes, “It is the fate of the West, and in particular the United States, to have to deal with the combined threat of Shia and Sunni extremists. And for all the differences that exist between them - and they are significant - they share some common features. Their brand of radicalism is theocratic, totalitarian, illiberal, expansionist, violent, and deeply anti-Semitic and anti-American ... All of us would prefer years of repose to years of conflict. But history will not allow it. And so it once again rests with this remarkable republic to do what we have done in the past: our duty.”
Posted by:Fred

#5  Talk is cheap, wavering is dangerous, appeasement is deadly...

I am not optimistic...
Posted by: BigEd   2007-01-05 13:09  

#4  declares that the war against global jihadism will be long, with success and setbacks along the way,
No shit, and the war will be shorter if we start fighting it soon. But if we drag our feet, I'm sure we can extend this conflict another 2 or 3 decades.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-01-05 12:43  

#3  It gives me glee when a speech writer with the last name of Wehner (Weiner?) even talks tougher than the Donks in Congress. Of course, their (Donks) quest for power may very well sink this nation once and for all.

Remember Sun Tzu's first ultimatum in war is "Know thine enemy". The President finally called it for what it is "Islamofascism", and this guy calls them "jihadis."
Posted by: BA   2007-01-05 10:40  

#2  The enemy is “not Islam per se” but a global network of extremists driven by a twisted vision of Islam.

A "twisted vision of Islam" firmly grounded in their "holy" books, the example of their "perfect man", and supported by the majority of the world's Muslims.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-01-05 07:44  

#1  Implement Pax Americana and the war is over in a week.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550   2007-01-05 01:05  

00:00