You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Costs for Iraq war approach record: US official
2006-12-20
WASHINGTON - US costs for the Iraq war will exceed $110 billion this fiscal year, approaching the record reached in the prior fiscal year, a top White House official said on Tuesday. “That number will end up being low,” White House budget director Rob Portman said.

Iraq war spending hit an all-time high of $120 billion in fiscal year 2006 that ended on Sept. 30. Some media reports have said the war costs for 2007 could total around $170 billion. But Portman declined to give a precise figure.

The White House is scheduled to unveil its 2008 spending blueprint in early February. Along with the spending plan, the administration will offer a fresh request for money for the war and will provide updated forecasts for the budget deficit. Portman said that with the unveiling of the budget for 2008, the administration will provide “more information than we have in the past” on estimates for future war spending.

Portman declined to comment on the costs that would be involved if 20,000 additional troops are sent to Iraq in the near future. Media reports have said that option is under consideration by President George W. Bush, who will unveil an overhauled strategy for the war early in the new year.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  And this compares to the cost of the economic losses of 9/11 exactly - how?

Can we also factor in some costs to recover from attacks averted by moving the 'flypaper' to the mideast? I figger the Iraq war is saving money!
Posted by: Bobby   2006-12-20 14:38  

#2  SO35; No it won't: the percentages will be played when convienient, raw dollars when not. Don't expect the MSM to be smart enough to keep up with the spin. and then there will be the inflation / cost of living thingy tossed in just to keep the issue murky to partly cloudy.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2006-12-20 14:24  

#1  This is going to be interesting. As the truth of required level of spending is revealed, the Dems will have to take a stand. Will they agree that defense budget should go back to 8-9% GDP where it belongs ? Agreeing to this will cause severe constipation to Pelosi, Reid, etc. because it will stop them from freely spending on health care, education, and other pet projects. This will cause a lot of sparklers to go off fersure.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-12-20 11:07  

00:00