You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Mark Tapscott: Pelosi preparing new shackles for free speech
2006-12-19
WASHINGTON - Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has cooked up with Public Citizen’s Joan Claybrook a “lobbying reform” that actually protects rich special interests and activists millionaires while clamping new shackles on citizens’ First Amendment rights to petition Congress and speak their minds.

Pelosi tried earlier this year to move H.R. 4682, the “Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2006,” which is now cited by Public Citizen’s Web site as the vehicle it is helping the incoming speaker to craft for the new Congress. The proposal Claybrook is helping craft for introduction early in 2007 is expected to be essentially the same bill Pelosi put forth this year.

That is bad news for the First Amendment and for preserving the kind of healthy, open debate that is essential to holding politicians, bureaucrats and special interests to account for their conduct of the public business.

The key provision of the 2006 bill was its redefinition of grassroots lobbying to include small citizens groups whose messages about Congress and public policy issues are directed toward the general public, according to attorneys for the Free Speech Coalition.

All informational and educational materials produced by such groups would have to be registered and reported on a quarterly basis. Failure to report would result in severe civil penalties (likely followed soon by criminal penalties as well).

In addition, the 2006 bill created a new statutory category of First Amendment activity to be regulated by Congress. Known as “grassroots lobbying firms,” these groups would be required to register with Congress and be subject to penalties whenever they are paid $50,000 or more to communicate with the general public during any three-month period.

In other words, for the first time in American history, potentially millions of concerned citizens involved in grassroots lobbying and representing viewpoints from across the entire political spectrum would have to register with Congress in order to exercise their First Amendment rights.
Posted by:Deacon Blues

#5  How many armed milita members (as defined by federal law) does the speaker have?

None.

The California State Militia is an unarmed volunteer group whose charter is the support of the state police and national guard. I considered joining them not to long ago until I figured out they were basically intended to be unarmed slave labor in the event of a state disaster - not actual militia forces.

In any event, Pelosi and company do not want armed militia groups in the USA. Unless you're her or one of her bodyguards, you should not be allowed to carry or even possess a firearm.

Posted by: FOTSGreg   2006-12-19 20:06  

#4  How many armed milita members (as defined by federal law) does the speaker have?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2006-12-19 19:36  

#3  They can't stop me from saying what I want. And if they try, well, we fought a revolution over that once before and we will do it again if need be.
Posted by: DarthVader   2006-12-19 19:09  

#2  Bite me, Nancy, I'll say what I like to whomever I please. If you can stop me, do it.

Otherwise...
Posted by: mojo   2006-12-19 16:12  

#1  Actions have consequences. Tip o' the iceberg, I'm afraid. Well America, you voted this witch from hell and all her scumbag friends into power. Oh, and FU America for doing so.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2006-12-19 15:19  

00:00