You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Qaeda getting stronger
2006-12-07
Al Qaeda may not have carried out any major attack on the West in 2006, but the next one is only a matter of time and Osama bin Laden and his followers enter 2007 stronger than ever, experts believe.

Al Qaeda and its allies “are winning the larger conflict” and recent events “indicate the continued vitality of Al Qaeda and the jihadi movement,” warned Michael Scheuer, former head of the bin Laden Unit at the CIA’s Counterterrorist Centre.

Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller, head of the Britain’s MI5 domestic intelligence agency, summed up the scale of the British government’s task in November when she said that “five major conspiracies in the UK” had been halted since mid-2005. “Today we see the use of home-made improvised explosive devices; tomorrow’s threat may include the use of chemicals, bacteriological agents, radioactive materials and even nuclear technology.

For the former top CIA official Scheuer, Al Qaeda and other groups have never been stronger. Alongside events in Britain, Al Qaeda claimed responsibility for the September suicide attacks on two Western oil companies, in Afghanistan the pace of the Taliban-led insurgency continues to accelerate, and in Iraq the groupÂ’s head has reasserted his support for the leader of the Iraqi resistance, Scheuer noted.

And it is with Afghanistan and with neighbouring northwest Pakistan that many of these plots are inextricably linked, since many of those planning attacks in the West receive training and combat practice from Al Qeada in these countries.

A top Pakistani security source told AFP on condition of anonymity in August that authorities had captured entire groups of militants planning attacks but that most of those seized go on to reappear in other groups, more determined and more dangerous.

For most Western experts Al Qaeda represents a double-edged danger in the coming years: the old guard and new converts throughout the world, alienated in their home countries, indoctrinated via the Internet and inspired by Western setbacks in Afganistan and Iraq.

And for Scheuer, the possible beginning of a phased withdrawal of US-led coalition forces from Iraq “would allow bin Laden to score, in the perception of most Muslims, an unprecedented hat-trick of successes”. US troops going home would allow the redeployment of many Iraq-based foreign fighters to Europe, the Arabian peninsula, other Middle East areas and the Horn of Africa, Scheuer believes, and would dramatically increase bin Laden’s status as a leader.
Posted by:Fred

#4  Good job of digging, Sneaze Shaiting3550 -- veeeeery interesting. Thanks!
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-12-07 20:59  

#3  Al-Qaeda in Iraq claims to be doing the bulk of the fighting. And forget Shiite friendly Syria as financiers. The Sunnis are being paid by members of the Saud royal family. That is: there has been no change in Saudi support for terror. The Sauds finally won their campaign to control al-Qaeda.

I have checked out some of the combat claims made on al-Qaeda in Iraq's website. Some check out. I have cause to believe that most sniper murders against US troops, are being done by al-Qaeda. That is one reason why I am surprised that the US is brokering peace negotiations in Jordan, in which al-Qaeda is a party (albeit in another name). Check out al-Qaeda's Shura Council reports:
http://press-release.blogspot.com/

For those who don't know, "Dajjal Army"(Army of the Anti-Christ) refers to al-Sadr's "Mahdi Army." And you know what they mean by "Crusader." "Lions of Islam" are the suicide murderers.

Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550   2006-12-07 18:55  

#2  Michael Scheuer is promoting the growth of terrorism because it covers the utter lack of success under his watch. If terrorists are growing stronger now, it cannot be his, and his friends' faults.

al Qaeda, at its best, was a loose network of cells based out of Afghanistan. At this time, most of the operational leadership is dead or in captivity, and most of the original foot soldiers are dead. Some of the wacky estimates of al Qaeda's original size would have made Afghanistan the tourist capital of South Asia. Not true.

The Scheuerites have redefined Islamic terrorism from the definition they used when they could have done something about it. Now Hamas and Hezb. are Islamic terrorists. Ten years ago everyone went out of their way to deny that at State and the CIA.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-12-07 10:55  

#1  "the next one is only a matter of time "

And when it happens, the will be angrily blaming Bush (and Blair) for it, rather than Al Qaeda. And they certainly won't be looking in the mirror to find the enablers.
Posted by: Glenmore   2006-12-07 07:20  

00:00