Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Culture Wars | |
Columbia journalism students cheat on ethics exam | |
2006-12-02 | |
![]() This is almost like being an intern with Reuters or CBS.
The exam in question consisted of two essay questions to be completed in 90 minutes any time during a 36-hour period. Students who took the test early were instructed to avoid discussing the questions with those planning to take it later, but the warning was ignored. One honorable young scholar got wind of what happened and blew the whistle, sources said. Vice Dean David Klatell told students in an e-mail that there had been a "serious problem" with the final and ordered them to attend a special session of the class "Critical Issues in Journalism" today - or fail. The order applies only to the Friday morning section. The evening section is exempt. It was unclear how many students could be affected. The course, which includes such issues as "Why be Ethical?" and "Tribal Loyalty vs. Journalistic Obligation," is taught by New York Times columnist Samuel G. Freedman, who could not be reached yesterday. One source said of the special session, "It's an 'Out yourself or you'll all have to suffer' situation." A Columbia spokesman confirmed Klatell had fired off the e-mail, but did not release details about the "problem." | |
Posted by:Jackal |
#4 From the people who bring you stringers for good A |
Posted by: Procopius2K 2006-12-02 10:34 |
#3 Well, did you expect journalists to pass an etics exam without cribing? |
Posted by: gromgoru 2006-12-02 00:12 |
#2 The course, which includes such issues as "Why be Ethical?" and "Tribal Loyalty vs. Journalistic Obligation," is taught by New York Times columnist Samuel G. Freedman, who could not be reached yesterday. Ya sure he's not recruiting? They look like Times material to me. |
Posted by: tu3031 2006-12-01 21:40 |
#1 I'll repeat this for tomorrow - if I can figure out how - posted too late for full comment cycle - and it's worthy, lol. |
Posted by: .com 2006-12-01 21:39 |