Submit your comments on this article |
Afghanistan |
NATO urged to plan Afghan exit strategy |
2006-11-28 |
![]() The Belchians? But... But... Without the Belchian Hairdresser Corps all of NATO would wither! It said that heads of the alliance’s 26 nations were unlikely to agree to send reinforcements to Afghanistan. Yeah. We heard Europe is washing its hair that year. The report said the Belgian minister’s comments would alarm senior figures at the alliance’s headquarters where there was already concern that France was getting cold feet about its role in Afghanistan. Paris had remained publicly committed to the mission, but NATO sources were concerned about the possibility of an eventual French withdrawal, it said. La Belle France? Quelle surprise! French President Chirac said on Monday that France wanted its NATO partners to set up a “contact group” to review and reorganise the alliance’s mission in Afghanistan. A French diplomat said that Paris feared the NATO mission to Afghanistan was trying to “impose rather than keep the peace”. Ummm... If you don't impose it, y'got nothin' to keep, do you? Belgian Defence Minister André Flahaut brought anxieties about the Afghan mission into the open when he suggested that, at the Riga summit, “We finally reflect on an exit strategy.” Flahaut argued, “Over time, NATO forces risk appearing like an army of occupation.” What if that's what it takes? Meanwhile on Monday, the US called on NATO allies to do more in Afghanistan, but acknowledged that domestic politics held some countries back from a more robust presence there. “If allies have agreed by consensus to take on a mission, they should help each other to carry out the mission,” said a senior US official. |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Hell, OP, just get rid of NATO altogether - it's time is past. We don't need to defend EUrope and if they want to fight it out amongst themselves (again), well have at it. |
Posted by: Spot 2006-11-28 14:54 |
#6 Time to move NATO Headquarters to either Amsterdam or London, and tell the Belgians, French, and GERMANS they either pay to play, or they get out and get lost. Create a "coalition of the willing", and build a closer relation with those members. Let the rest take care of themselves. France will soon be fully entrenched on the dark side soon anyway, instead of only halfway. |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2006-11-28 13:58 |
#5 Spot, there is a bit of frustration within NATO because the Americans, Canadians, British and Dutch troops are doing the heavy lifting and taking casualties while the the French and Germans are confined to quarters during nighttime and weekends as a security measure. |
Posted by: john 2006-11-28 11:27 |
#4 Phuck the Phrench. |
Posted by: Excalibur 2006-11-28 11:17 |
#3 Swedes and Finns shot it out with Talibs on 9/12/06. Nordic team 1, Talibs 0. |
Posted by: Chuck Simmins 2006-11-28 10:23 |
#2 UmmmmÂ…donÂ’t you remember elementary school where you had a 20 minute time out in the corner? These guys were caught living off of American military welfare for 60 years, so this is their punishment for being welfare queens. ThatÂ’s why theyÂ’re asking - is it time yet? They were more than happy to fight to the last American in Europe for their social nanny state, but support democracy elsewhere in the world? YouÂ’re kidding? |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2006-11-28 08:47 |
#1 Correct me if I'm wrong, but with the US, UK, Canada and Denmark (or Dutch?) doing the real work, who cares about the sprouts or frogs? |
Posted by: Spot 2006-11-28 08:07 |