You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
US paper deplores Dutch ban on burqas
2006-11-19
But we already knew which side the LA Times is on, didn't we?
The Netherlands’ decision to seek legislation banning the wearing of a burqa or niqab has been criticised by a leading American newspaper as a “spectacularly bad case of overreaching”.

In an editorial, the Los Angeles Times on Saturday noted that five days before a national election, the Netherlands’ centre-right government announced that it would introduce legislation to ban the wearing of burqas, veils and similar garments in public places. It said, “Should it pass, the most famously accepting country in Europe would have the most restrictive anti-Muslim laws on the Continent. This is a spectacularly bad case of overreaching, even if you believe - as we do - that it’s unfortunate that some women are forced by their culture to cloak themselves in anonymity before going out in public. Also, there are some Muslim women who feel exposed without covering up.”
Posted by:Fred

#4  Women can choose to stay inside, or disguise themselves before leaving home, or much better, quit the religion of death, murder and dhimmitude and join the human race. Applications not necessary.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-11-19 18:33  

#3  even if you believe - as we do - that itÂ’s unfortunate that some women are forced by their culture to cloak themselves in anonymity before going out in public.

It's not "unfortunate", it's unacceptable. As Holland insists.
Posted by: Thinemp Whimble2412   2006-11-19 10:44  

#2  I assume this means the LA Times is in favor of sexually mutilating two-year old girls with a pair of scissors.
Posted by: Excalibur   2006-11-19 09:13  

#1  So does this mean that the LA Times supports the same concept of identity concealment that the Klan enjoyed for so many years?
Posted by: Cheating Angeaque9874   2006-11-19 08:44  

00:00