Submit your comments on this article |
Iraq |
Kissinger: Military victory no longer possible in Iraq |
2006-11-19 |
![]() Military victory is no longer possible in Iraq, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said in a television interview broadcast Sunday. Kissinger presented a bleak vision of Iraq, saying the U.S. government must enter into dialogue with Iraq's regional neighbors – including Iran – if progress is to be made in the region. "If you mean by 'military victory' an Iraqi government that can be established and whose writ runs across the whole country, that gets the civil war under control and sectarian violence under control in a time period that the political processes of the democracies will support, I don't believe that is possible," he told the British Broadcasting Corp. But Kissinger, an architect of the Vietnam war who has advised President Bush about Iraq, warned against a rapid withdrawal of coalition troops, saying it could destabilize Iraq's neighbors and cause a long-lasting conflict. "A dramatic collapse of Iraq – whatever we think about how the situation was created – would have disastrous consequences for which we would pay for many years and which would bring us back, one way or another, into the region," he said. Kissinger, whose views have been sought by the Iraqi Study Group, led by former Secretary of State James Baker III, called for an international conference bringing together the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, Iraq's neighbors – including Iran – and regional powers like India and Pakistan to work out a way forward for the region. "I think we have to redefine the course, but I don't think that the alternative is between military victory, as defined previously, or total withdrawal," he said. This is the man who thought we had lost the Cold War to the USSR, and if we had followed his policies, we would have. |
Posted by:Jackal |
#10 There are some people who once were considered great, but who, in reflection, deserve only to be shot for their idiocy. Add Henry Kissinger's name to that list. The list is getting extremely long again, and will require the Grim Reaper to shorten. I just hope that not TOO many innocents perish with them. |
Posted by: Old Patriot 2006-11-19 22:59 |
#9 Kissinger reminds me of a triangle player in an orchestra. Every so often, he strikes up with a single note. "Ding". This was his moment in the sun. |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2006-11-19 20:28 |
#8 Many have described this guy as a realist. I think he was, but of a very specific school. Kissinger was a declinist. He saw a United States in decline. His job, while Secretary of State, was to manage this decline with as much grace as humanly possible. Three decades later, he still sees Uncle Sam in decline. Once again, he believes the task at hand is to manage this decline. What a surprise... |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2006-11-19 20:24 |
#7 Not even interesting to listen too, he has no good advise to give to Republicans or the US of A. |
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom 2006-11-19 19:18 |
#6 But Kissinger, an architect of the Vietnam war . . . 'Nuff said. I find it interesting to listen to him, lots of good points on small and medium-sized stuff, but for some reason he apparently doesn't see the huge stuff very well. |
Posted by: gorb 2006-11-19 17:53 |
#5 Angling for another Paris gig? |
Posted by: ed 2006-11-19 15:45 |
#4 So he's worried about destablizing Iran and Syria. Is he suggesting we go back to his old policy of backing despicable strongmen and turning a blind eye? |
Posted by: Danking70 2006-11-19 15:30 |
#3 But Kissinger, an architect of the Vietnam war And that qualifies him as an expert on snapping defeat from the jaws of victory. Thats it in a nutshell. Once a loser always a LOSER. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2006-11-19 13:50 |
#2 Essentially, he is. He just does not know it yet. |
Posted by: twobyfour 2006-11-19 13:30 |
#1 I thought he was dead already. |
Posted by: Unique Battle 2006-11-19 12:45 |