You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
'Afghanistan violence will double next year'
2006-11-17
Insurgent violence in Afghanistan this year will likely double that of 2005 and will continue next year, the US militaryÂ’s top intelligence official told Congress on Wednesday.

General Michael Maples, director of the US Defence Intelligence Agency, said insurgents had expanded their abilities and operations even while incurring serious combat losses. “Despite having absorbed heavy combat losses in 2006, the insurgency has strengthened its capabilities and influence with its core base of Pashtun communities,” he told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The head of the Central Intelligence Agency, General Michael Hayden, in his testimony emphasised the need to continue supporting the Afghan government of President Hamid Karzai. “Kabul needs help because it lacks capacity, not because it lacks political will or lacks support,” Hayden said. “President Karzai understands this and recognises his government’s responsibility.” Citing a recent conversation with the US ambassador in Kabul, Ron Neuman, Hayden said “the effort would take a long time — in my view, at least a decade — and cost many billions of dollars. I would add that the Afghan government won’t be able to do it alone.”
Posted by:Fred

#7  He did, Shipman. Hindu-Moslem violence, for example, has always been called "communal" violence.

Posted by: Eric Jablow   2006-11-17 17:00  

#6  There has been bad publicity in Pakistan concerning Mullah deceit that led young terrorists to be slaughtered.

Now that is an interesting tidbit, Sneaze Shaiting3550. Very interesting indeed. Ties in nicely with the Afghans televising interviews with captured jihadi wannabees around Ramadan, complaining how the experience wasn't at all what was promised.
Posted by: trailing wife   2006-11-17 16:15  

#5  core base of Pashtun communities

Say it! Say it! Damnit.
Posted by: Shipman   2006-11-17 15:55  

#4  I don't believe the report. Balochi nationalists have hardened on phony refugees from Afghanistan and the federal government is responding. As for the Waziri tribalists, Pakistan signed an agreement with them with the purpose of enabling cross-border retaliation by NATO.

There has been bad publicity in Pakistan concerning Mullah deceit that led young terrorists to be slaughtered.
Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550   2006-11-17 13:32  

#3  Another totally lost cause, unless we address the problem in Pakland. We apparently are burning $2 billion per week in Iraq. How much are we wasting in Afganland ? I haven't seen recent figures. What's really interesting is that these figures may not include fuel burned daily in patrols by Navy/ Air Force. This figure alone must be staggering. This has a lot to do with complete utilization worldwide of oil. This never gets mentioned either. The US is in serious economic straits. Most of this is fantasy funding, supplied by buyers of Treasury notes. We will never be able to repay this debt. Then what ? What will the lives of US citizens born today be like in 75 years ? Maybe not too good if the country is forced to function in debtor class.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-11-17 12:09  

#2  Blood or money.

Choose.
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-17 01:20  

#1  Insurgent violence in Afghanistan this year will likely double that of 2005 and will continue next year

Especially when the cut-n-run party takes over Congress...

“Kabul needs help because it lacks capacity, not because it lacks political will or lacks support”

Saigon, 1975.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-11-17 01:04  

00:00