Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Chuck Says He'll Veto the Next Alito |
2006-11-15 |
More than the inability to influence Iraq policy or the President’s tax cuts, Chuck Schumer says that the single greatest failure of the Democrats as an opposition party was allowing Samuel Alito to join the Supreme Court. “Judges are the most important,” said Mr. Schumer, who orchestrated the implausible Democratic takeover of the Senate last week. “One more justice would have made it a 5-4 conservative, hard-right majority for a long time. That won’t happen.” From now on, all the President’s judicial appointments will need to meet the requirements of Mr. Schumer, the Park Slope power broker who has happily accepted the mantle of chief architect for the Democrats’ effort to build a majority for the 2008 elections and beyond. The Senator also intends, in the coming months, to rework the federal government’s funding priorities in New York’s favor, to steer the Democrats toward a radically new position on Iraq and, while he’s at it, to cement his position as the unofficially declared tactical guru for the national party. And in case anyone’s wondering, yes, Mr. Schumer is entirely comfortable with this sort of power. With his Gold Toe–stockinged feet dangling, the 55-year-old slumped in his armchair on Friday morning as if it were a leather throne. On his apartment’s front door, a neighbor taped up a front page of The New York Times heralding the Democrats’ success and scrawled “Congratulations Schumers!” across the cover. The candidates that Mr. Schumer recruited, groomed and bankrolled had won a comprehensive victory over the incumbent Republicans, giving the Democrats a narrow majority in the Senate to complement a rout in the House. Since the election, Mr. Schumer has been awash in attention from the media, his Democratic colleagues and even from the President, who called, quite sportingly, soon after the results were finalized. |
Posted by:Fred |
#10 I've said it before, Chucky Schumer does more to advance the cause of antisemitism in America than any Islamonazi in a mosque gathering in a month of Fridays. Well I haven't said exactly that before, but you know what I mean. And, while we're at it, Alito is such a horrible man, isn't he ? WTF ? |
Posted by: wxjames 2006-11-15 12:07 |
#9 And in case anyone’s wondering, yes, Mr. Schumer is entirely comfortable with this sort of power. With his Gold Toe–stockinged feet dangling, the 55-year-old slumped in his armchair on Friday morning as if it were a leather throne Power by law he shouldn't have but by politics he wields. This is a sad little man. Bush should appoint judges and Schumar should allow votes; it's in what is left of the constitution. God save us from the left. |
Posted by: badanov 2006-11-15 11:34 |
#8 Jackal's on a roll, again, lol. |
Posted by: .com 2006-11-15 11:19 |
#7 lol! |
Posted by: anon 2006-11-15 11:14 |
#6 Well, another Roberts would be an improvement over Ginsburg or Stevens. So would Harriet Miers. Heck, so would Miss Beasely. |
Posted by: Jackal 2006-11-15 11:14 |
#5 I prefer Chuck on the tube 24/7. Give him free rein to speak his mind on any subject that suits his fancy. |
Posted by: mrp 2006-11-15 08:52 |
#4 more likely, in his rush to a TV camera, a slip and fall. Hubris-pig he is, fascinated by his own image. Leather throne indeed |
Posted by: Frank G 2006-11-15 08:36 |
#3 Oh, no. That Noble, it is. Yes. /Yoda |
Posted by: .com 2006-11-15 08:07 |
#2 not if he cracks his head open and winds up brain ded. |
Posted by: RD 2006-11-15 07:59 |
#1 Is it wrong to wish he'd slip and fall down a staircase? |
Posted by: anon 2006-11-15 07:49 |