You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Basra boat bombing blamed on rogue Shias: Tatertots Gone Rancid
2006-11-14
Video: Insurgents change tactics to bring terror to the waterways

The terrorists responsible for the deaths of four British soldiers killed in a bomb attack in Iraq are suspected to be from rogue Shia militias.

A detailed forensic examination at the scene of the bombing, which also left three soldiers severely wounded, was under way yesterday in an attempt to trace the killers.

advertisementMilitary commanders are concerned that the insurgents had identified a weak spot in British defences by targeting boats on the Shatt al Arab that cuts through Basra.

Security assessments are being conducted to discover how to avoid further attacks on the waterway that the British patrol to prevent smuggling of guns, drugs and cash.

The Ministry of Defence named the regiments of the four men killed in the attack that targeted two patrol boats near a pontoon bridge just two hours after the Remembrance Service in Basra.

One of the soldiers was from the Royal Signals, one from the Intelligence Corps, a third from 539 Assault Squadron and the fourth from 45 Commando, Royal Marines.

One of the seriously injured men had "improved significantly" although the other two remained "very serious", an MoD spokesman said yesterday.

It is believed that a remote control device was used to detonate the bomb as two boats approached the bridge.

Military sources believe the terrorists knew the bridge only opened on Sundays and targeted the troops as they passed through or close to the west bank.

British troops vowed to hunt down the killers once the forensic examination had been completed.

"We will be carrying out a follow-up operation to target those responsible," an officer in Basra said.

Before the attack the waterway, which forms the boundary between Iraq and Iran, had been considered a safer way of transporting troops and equipment than by road.

The Prime Minister yesterday called for Iran and Syria to be engaged in efforts to secure peace in Iraq and the Middle East.

Des Browne, the Defence Secretary, also stressed the situation in Iraq could not be viewed in isolation.

"Throughout the conflict we have been calling on Iran and Syria to do more to stop the flow into Iraq of foreign fighters, bomb-making equipment and know-how," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

He added that the bombing was a "stark reminder" of the perils faced by troops in Iraq.

He said: "This terrible incident reinforces in our minds the sacrifice made by the brave men and women of our armed forces."

The families of the casualties have been informed but some requested that their names should not be released for 24 hours, the MoD said.


Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  fuck the infrastructure, kill all the heads of the shia malitia, waste, destroy, let them come begging.
Posted by: pihkalbadger   2006-11-14 23:11  

#5  It's really simple...as OS has stated:

1. Surround a city (e.g., Ramadi). Give everyone 2 weeks to vacate. After 2 weeks pound the city to rubble. Hand every returning a check for $25,000 USD and help them rebuild.

2. Declare the border regions of SA, Syria, and Iran a free fire zone from evening twilight until sunrise. Anything, and I mean anything with a heat signature is a target.

Posted by: anymouse   2006-11-14 16:21  

#4  Phil I was in KFOR briefly. I have lots fo old firends who served there as well. Let me tell you that is NOT a solution. You're simply wrong. Allowing them to kill each other only results in more chaos and the Terrs thrive on that. Its not the right solution unless you want to hand over the entire country to the terrs, and watch the peopel we promised to help build the country become headless corpses. Yours is the wrong answer.

Fallujah is the right answer, although bloody. Fallujah kills the most bad guys, draws in their most dedicated, destroys them and their weapons and supplies, thier command and control infrastructure and tactical leadership in an entire population cetner, and allows the IP and IAF to roll in and keep it clean as long as they have been trained. The harvest of weaponry and bomb parts, etc, is what hurts them the most.

If we did that against several cities at the same time, like Ramadi etc, we'd knock the militias on their heels for long enough that the IAF would be able to get on its feet and administer the follow-on beatings that will be needed.

Securing the border is important, but drawing them in and beating them down on OUR terms FIRST is the way to be sure we aren't closing the barn door and locking the horses in a burning barn.

Clear those cities, and move the Iraqi troops in on our heels. Then set out for the borders and lock things down hard against wepaonry, etc coming in.


Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-14 13:02  

#3  No. It's time for the various forces in Iraq to forge their own equilibrium. All the US has to do is guarantee Iraq's borders.

Sure, we'll get whining about ethnic cleansing, but when it's done it's done, look at the ex-Yugoslavia.

Posted by: phil_b   2006-11-14 09:47  

#2  Amen, OS.
Posted by: Brett   2006-11-14 09:43  

#1  Time to go to war again.

Draw these militias out - sanitize whole towns in a cordon and clear.

They want to fight, lets fight them Fallujah style.

More troops and a bigger hammer.
Posted by: OldSpook   2006-11-14 09:02  

00:00