You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Shaukat Aziz asks US to think about exit strategy from Afghanistan
2006-11-14
Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz on Monday politely asked the United States to think about an exit strategy from Afghanistan.
Thereby leaving Afghanistan in the care of Pakland...
In an interview with the Washington Times, Aziz gave an implicit reminder that the US must leave Afghanistan eventually, in consultation with the Afghans, their neighbours and myriad stakeholders. "History is full of examples where we didn't focus too much on exit strategy," Aziz said. "A good exit strategy is one which leaves that country, that area, peaceful, economically and politically empowered. ... We are the most important stakeholder, and we are there for life. We cannot take off; countries cannot change their neighbours."
Withdrawal from Iraq's on the table, so the Paks are looking forward to what comes next.
The Times quoted the PM saying Pakistan, a key ally in the war on terror, welcomes an expected reappraisal of US policy in Iran and Afghanistan, and thinks military action alone is "not the answer" to the threat posed by extremists in the two countries."
"We can handle things here. Y'all can go home and ummmm... do whatever it is you do."
Shaukat Aziz told the newspaper that he would like to see a more nuanced approach to battling extremism, which includes massive investment and economic assistance to the two countries in order to build a sense of well-being for the poor and disenfranchised.
Not only "get out and let us play the Great Game in Afghanistan," but "give us the money to do it."
In New York for meetings at the United Nations, Aziz also said the world needs to focus more seriously on Afghanistan's narcotics trade, which is becoming an increasingly important source of terrorist financing. By some estimates, the trade accounts for half of Afghanistan's gross domestic product. An American commission headed by former Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Rep. Lee H. Hamilton is expected to recommend strategies for the Iraq war before year's end, a development that Mr. Aziz welcomed.
... since he expects them to be weak as water...
"We believe that conflicts like Iraq, Afghanistan and so on need to be carefully reviewed because military action is not the answer or the solution to such a crisis," he said. "We must work on winning the hearts and minds of the people.
Whenever they bring up the "hearts and minds" approach they don't want to do anything. "Hearts and minds" don't involve imposing your will on people.
"We have to involve the people, to give them the sense that the world cares and their future tomorrow will be better than yesterday."
Posted by:Fred

#7  How about this strategy:
We march to the SSE until we hit water, destroying any Taliban, terrorists, or anyone who fights us.
Posted by: Jackal   2006-11-14 21:59  

#6  Ahh, nooo. We don't have to do any damn thing, including consulting with you. We can pack our asses up anytime we choose. Don't aggravate us. We should Agent Orange every poppy field and poppy planter walking around your disgusting backward little piece of shit country.
Posted by: SpecOp35   2006-11-14 18:30  

#5  PAkistan should think about an exit strategy of the NWFP: the Durand treaty has eqpired since 1999.
Posted by: JFM   2006-11-14 09:22  

#4  "History is full of examples where we didn't focus too much on exit strategy," Aziz said

German, Japan. Tell me about it. American boots are still on the ground of two peaceful prosperous nations in the top 10 GDPs and per capita not driven by oil. Yep, that's a future you don't want.
Posted by: Procopius2K   2006-11-14 08:34  

#3  Do the Pakiwakis have an exit strategy? I suggest we propose to exit Afgan when Pak does.
Posted by: Spot   2006-11-14 08:32  

#2  He is missing a bet, here. Instead of talking withdrawl, he should be talking about evolving from military involvement to economic development. That would be getting his cake and eating it, too.

By not stressing economic development, he puts himself in the same catagory as those who thrive on poverty: religious extremists, mafias and other organized crime, and warlords.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-11-14 08:30  

#1  Don't forget "USA get out of ASIA-PACIFIC" as well, ala NORTH KOREA. Full-scale geopol retreat and isolationism saved America from WW1 + WW2, and D*** NG it can save us from WW3/4??? BORDER FENCE > "WE HERE, THEY'RE THERE, WE WANT THEM OVER HERE"??? ARABIAS FOR ARABS, ASIA FOR ASIANS, D **** IT, ERGO THE CHICOMS WANT UP TO 1/2 OF CONUS-NORAM + ELIMINATE 200M OF 300M Americans = Amerikans, POLITELY BUT NECESSARILY OF COURSE. The Commies want big smiles + group hugs + waving hands on our group photos before we happily enter the gulags-death chambers.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-14 00:35  

00:00