You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Democrats push for Iraq withdrawal
2006-11-13
DEMOCRATS, who won control of the US Congress, said today they would push to begin withdrawing American troops from Iraq in the next few months. "First order of business is to change the direction of Iraq policy," said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat expected to be chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee in the new Congress that convenes in January. The Iraqi government must be told that US presence was "not open-ended and that, as a matter of fact, we need to begin a cut-and-run phased redeployment of forces from Iraq in four to six months", Senator Levin said on ABC's This Week.

President George W. Bush has insisted that US troops would not leave until Iraqis could take over security for their country, and has repeatedly rejected setting a timetable for withdrawal, saying that would only embolden the insurgents. However, the White House said Mr Bush was open to new ideas and the President would tomorrow meet the bipartisan Iraq Study Group expected to recommend alternative policies in its final report.
Posted by:Fred

#10  So, are the Democrats gonna buck the UN resolutions?

Should be interesting to see how they waffle, doublespeak, ignore, flip flop, retreat from finesse, interpret and restate what was really meant by these UN resolutions.
Posted by: JohnQC   2006-11-13 12:40  

#9  If I remember correctly the US and the other coalition members , as per a couple of UN resolutions,are responsible for Iraq's security until such time as they can do the job themselves. So, are the Democrats gonna buck the UN resolutions?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2006-11-13 12:31  

#8  So mebbe the Donks will adopt the Trunk position, but call it something else?

Mebbe. The democrats can read polls as good as anyone. The voters may have 'thrown the bums out', but they have doubts about the 'new' bums. Gonna be interesting in 2007.
Posted by: Pappy   2006-11-13 10:32  

#7  ...I had the thoroughly unpleasant experience of dealing with SEN Levin about 22 years ago while I was stationed at Wurtsmith AFB, MI. He not only treated my troops and as if we were something to scrape off our shoes, he spoke to our wing commander with utter, absolute, and undisguised contempt. Yet he had the balls to be surprised and angry when DOD decided not to base the B-1 at Wurtsmith, primarily because of his attitude towards the military.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2006-11-13 09:23  

#6  Ah, yes, a useful Jew fool.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-11-13 08:28  

#5  Carl Levin has a history of being a tool of the Pal voters in the Detroit area.

CAIR loves him.
Posted by: 3dc   2006-11-13 08:04  

#4  I heard on the radio this morning a Dem saying we must redeploy (and I swear he said) after the sectarian violence is controlled.

So mebbe the Donks will adopt the Trunk position, but call it something else?
Posted by: Bobby   2006-11-13 06:28  

#3  WND.com > Joseph Farah article CONSERVATIVISM'S DEATH THROES > America is sliding towards SOCIALISM + IMMORALITY [Amorality? Un-Morality?]. Agree in part, disagree in part. Farah fails to recognize that the Lefties are more than willing to resort to wilfully confusing, across-the-board multi-level, vertical = horizontal = oblique, dialecticism + hypocrisies to get its way. 2006 Elex > the Dems have all but formally acknowledged their [ULTRA]CONSERVATIVE, TRUE FUTURE AGENDA - MODERATE/CENTRIST FOR NOW, ULTRA = TOTALITARIAN AS TIME GOES ON. Right now, ALTERNATISM > feel-good, wavy gravy, PC Leftspeak for LIMITED GOVERNMENTISM-WELFARIST ABSOLUTISM. In reality, ALTERNATISM is dead and gone forever, and thats politely presuming that the Left actually believed in its own Altern agenda to begin with. For a while yet, the [potemkinist]Waffle = Egg = Toast Bread luvin' Left will deliber refrain from using the labels SOCIALISM, CONSERVATIVISM, GOVERNMENTISM + ABSOLUTISM + AMERIKAN RED ARMY = PEOPLE'S ARMY when in front of the MSM.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2006-11-13 04:24  

#2  Bush is the CINC, DhimmiDonks and the Iraq Study Group notwithstanding. I'd say he has precisely zero reason, now, to placate them. Last 2 years of his last term with an opposition-held Congress which can't afford to be seen shorting the troops and a public which demands good news or else, but soundly against cut 'n run. Must be a wild time for the historians... So many books and lecture circuit tour dates in the offing. Interesting and deadly times.
Posted by: .com   2006-11-13 03:42  

#1  Democratspeak: New Direction == Retreat
Posted by: badanov   2006-11-13 00:23  

00:00