| Submit your comments on this article |
| Europe |
| German proposes a European army |
| 2006-11-07 |
| Kurt Beck, leader of the Social Democrats, called Monday for a European army with a single command, the first time a German political party has proposed such a structure. If adopted, it could lead to the European Union pursuing a security and defense policy independent of NATO. The proposal was immediately rejected by President Lech Kaczynski of Poland, who said in Vilnius on Monday that the EU should build an army of 100,000 that would remain linked to NATO. Alliance officials said NATO supported the EU playing a greater security and defense role. In his first major foreign policy speech since becoming leader of a party that is joined in coalition with Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative bloc, Beck said Europe should become a "global peace power" with its own military command and goals. That goal has eluded European governments in the past and there is no agreement on it now. Still, security analysts said the proposal from Beck, who became party leader last May, reflected unease in Germany and elsewhere in Europe about NATO's identification with U.S. leadership. Beck told delegates during a special meeting in Berlin that such defense ambitions for the EU would not rupture the trans-Atlantic relationship because, without the United States, "we cannot solve global problems." However, instead of "following" or "adhering" to the United States, he said, the Europeans should establish a partnership "based on quality(sic). This is the particular challenge for Europe." Perhaps that should have been equality. In the long term, Beck said, "Europe's security and defense policy would have a single military command." Germany is preparing to take over the rotating presidency of the EU in January. Its Defense Ministry is trying to define how and when the German Army should intervene in trouble spots during peacekeeping or crisis prevention missions. By airing the idea of an integrated European force, Beck has revived a debate that only three years ago was seen as a threat to the basis of the trans-Atlantic relationship. At that time President Jacques Chirac of France; Gerhard Schröder, who was chancellor of Germany, and the leaders of Belgium and Luxembourg, all of whom opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, proposed an EU military headquarters. NATO said that would be a direct threat to the alliance and the trans-Atlantic relationship. Since then, the idea had been placed on the back burner because Britain, Poland and some other countries opposed a single European command, arguing it would be at the expense of NATO. The fault linew in Europe are becoming clearer. There is no advantage to the US is trying to pretend that Europe is something it isn't. In fact denying reality only means the split will be more devastating when it does come. |
| Posted by:Nimble Spemble |
| #7 Good idea, but only if they wear that spiked helmet the Germans wore during the first year or two of WWI. |
| Posted by: Lancasters Over Dresden 2006-11-07 23:52 |
| #6 What on earth is a "global peace power"? |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2006-11-07 23:38 |
| #5 Well, as a professor of vocational choice once said, you like to do what you do well and you do well what you like to do. |
| Posted by: Nimble Spemble 2006-11-07 13:01 |
| #4 Hitler must be thinking, "why didn't I think of that?" |
| Posted by: Clkethel OHlkdj 2006-11-07 13:01 |
| #3 With an international army you can put down pesky little insurrections without having to rely on the loyalty of the local military. Wouldn't be a hoot to see German troops restoring the peace in Paris? (just an example of course) |
| Posted by: BrerRabbit 2006-11-07 12:48 |
| #2 "based on quality(sic). This is the particular challenge for Europe." Basing anything, in the land of the A380, on Quality is going to be quite a challenge. |
| Posted by: Jackal 2006-11-07 11:32 |
| #1 The hundred-thousand man army...hmm...where have I heard that idea before? |
| Posted by: gromky 2006-11-07 10:47 |