You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Afghanistan
One NATO soldier, 55 Taliban killed in fresh fighting
2006-10-30
(KUNA) -- A NATO soldier and 55 Taliban fighters were killed as fighting erupted in Afghanistan's southern Uruzgan province last night and continued till Sunday morning. Afghan officials say Taliban attacked a joint convoy of NATO and Afghan military in Chora valley, situated north of the provincial capital of Tarinkot. Mohammad Qasim, police chief of the province, said the NATO forces also call air support to target the hideouts of the assailants. He said the clash was still continued with both sides using light and heavy arms.

About 150 Taliban attacked their convoy with small arms which sparked fighting between the two sides. The NATO forces called close air support and their helicopters pounded Taliban's positions.
A statement issued by the NATO forces says one of their soldiers was killed and eight wounded when their vehicle hit a landmine in the area. Nationalities of the soldiers were not released. The statement said in the same area, about 150 Taliban attacked their convoy with small arms which sparked fighting between the two sides. The NATO forces called close air support and their helicopters pounded Taliban's positions. In the fire fight lasting several hours, the insurgents were engaged by the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and the Afghan National Army (ANA) small arms fire, attack helicopters and close air support. "Close cooperation between the ANA and ISAF ensured the defeat of the insurgents and initial battle damage assessment indicates that up to 55 insurgents were killed," said the NATO forces.
Posted by:Fred

#14  I prefer to know what kind of losses we are inflicting. Just for morale purposes. I think the pluses outweigh the minuses.

Everyone on this board knows we give much worse than we get -- but I'm not so sure that's true about the general public.
Posted by: Moon6   2006-10-30 23:57  

#13  I don't think the body counts are hurting us in elections.

Well, the lack of some kind of metric is hurting us. Body counts come to mind. But westerners have to realize that like the Vietnamese, terrorists are willing to expend millions to make their point.
Posted by: gorb   2006-10-30 16:07  

#12  I don't think the body counts are hurting us in elections. I think it's the sense of a lack of progress. At the end of the day most people won't remember if there were 3,000 US dead or 15,000. But they will remember if we won or lost.

Posted by: Iblis   2006-10-30 13:12  

#11  Regardles...55 toe-tags...and the vaunted winter offensive fetivities haven't even started!!
Posted by: anymouse   2006-10-30 13:09  

#10  Faith is a wonderful thing, but conservatives typically reserve faith for the realm of the divine. If we can't see results in the form of a peaceful Iraq quite yet, it would be nice to see how many terrorists our guys are taking down along the road to that objective. The body counts that are killing us in the polls are the ones about American casualties. If this indifference to public opinion keeps up much longer, the Democrats are going to hand Iraq over to the enemy, as they did with South Vietnam three decades ago.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-10-30 12:02  

#9  A: Civilians as a rule don't have a grasp of war, which is why they fall prey to things like war photography and body counts and think that things are terrible.

I don't see that the body counts from Afghanistan are making the US public squeamish. My feeling is that conservatives are getting antsy about Iraq because they see a war with only US casualties.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-10-30 11:56  

#8  Purely from a personal perspective, I would like to see the body counts published but certainly not inflated. I would like confirmed kills. I guess it's a primal instinct for retribution, but I lost alot on 9/11 and most of us in the fire service (at least in my area) are looking for hard data that we are kicking ass. The only thing we hear from MSM and even Fox News is the the fatalities of US GI's, the civilian casualties in Iraq and the occasion blurb about the resurgent Taliban who have lost some 2,500 fighters this year. I agree with Zhang r/e release the numbers let the enemy know we are hammering them, provided most of them can read.

Brian
Posted by: Rightwing   2006-10-30 09:28  

#7  It was the Dutch and Aussies, I believe.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2006-10-30 08:47  

#6  I agree that body counting is problematic back home.

Civilians as a rule don't have a grasp of war, which is why they fall prey to things like war photography and body counts and think that things are terrible.

In turn, this represents an even bigger breakdown in communications between the military and the civilian world as a whole, that has existed for decades.

Though the military has made some furtive and futile gestures to connect to the public, there remains a chasm of misunderstanding between them.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2006-10-30 08:22  

#5  first, it would be good if the numbers were published on a monthly basis instead of a PR effort.
Second, the taliban tactic of fighting in platoon or company size units is a total mistake. They are getting their clocks cleaned. It may be necessary because of the lack of properly trained fighters. This is precisely the desired situation in the WOT. Great work, Bush, Rumsfeld, etc.
Posted by: wxjames   2006-10-30 08:16  

#4  We disclosed enemy dead in Vietnam and it didn't do much good there AFAIK. Body counting for PR is a bad idea.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2006-10-30 06:49  

#3  Generally as good, sometimes a little worse, sometimes a little better. The Iraqi Army and Police are certainly releasing their enemy KIA numbers, usually 2-3 days after the end of the operation.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2006-10-30 04:08  

#2  Fine but are Iraqi numbers as good as the ones from Afghanistan?
Posted by: NWFP Assembly   2006-10-30 01:32  

#1  It seems to me that NATO has gone in for a body count approach, whereas the military commanders in Iraq have chosen not to disclose them. My feeling is that it would generally be better if we disclosed to the public how many enemy were killed in every engagement. That way, the public would stop thinking that this is an endless litany of one-sided battles in which GI's are killed and the terrorists get away clean. It would also be nice if we could present to the terrorist rank and file big picture statistics about how their leaders are leading them like lambs to the slaughter. Instead, we guard our numbers on enemy dead jealously and make it seem like the enemy are magicians who kill our boys and get away without a scratch time and time again. This simultaneously weakens home front support and encourages potential terrorist recruits to believe that theirs is an omnipotent and irresistible force.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2006-10-30 01:24  

00:00